Literature DB >> 22622952

A prospective single-center study of sentinel lymph node detection in cervical carcinoma: is there a place in clinical practice?

Omer Devaja1, Gautam Mehra, Michael Coutts, Stephen Attard Montalto, John Donaldson, Mallikarjun Kodampur, Andreas John Papadopoulos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in early cervical cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sentinel lymph node detection was performed prospectively over a 6-year period in 86 women undergoing surgery for cervical carcinoma by the combined method (Tc-99m and methylene blue dye). Further ultrastaging was performed on a subgroup of 26 patients who had benign SLNs on initial routine histological examination.
RESULTS: The SLN was detected in 84 (97.7%) of 86 women by the combined method. Blue dye uptake was not seen in 8 women (90.7%). Sentinel lymph nodes were detected bilaterally in 63 women (73.3%), and the external iliac region was the most common anatomic location (48.8%). The median SLN count was 3 nodes (range, 1-7). Of the 84 women with sentinel node detection, 65 also underwent bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, and in none of these cases was a benign SLN associated with a malignant non-SLN (100% negative predictive value). The median non-SLN count for all patients was 19 nodes (range, 8-35). Eighteen patients underwent removal of the SLN without bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Nine women (10.5%) had positive lymph nodes on final histology. One patient had bulky pelvic nodes on preoperative imaging and underwent removal of the negative bulky malignant lymph nodes and a benign SLN on the contralateral side. This latter case confirms the unreliability of the SLN method with bulky nodes. The remaining 8 patients had positive SLNs with negative nonsentinel lymph nodes. Fifty-nine SLNs from 26 patients, which were benign on initial routine histology, underwent ultrastaging, but no further disease was identified. Four patients (5%) relapsed after a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 8-80 months).
CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node detection is an accurate and safe method in the assessment of nodal status in early cervical carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22622952     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318253a9c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel node navigation surgery in cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Tatsuyuki Chiyoda; Kosuke Yoshihara; Masahiro Kagabu; Satoru Nagase; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Mikio Mikami; Tsutomu Tabata; Yasuyuki Hirashima; Yoichi Kobayashi; Masanori Kaneuchi; Hideki Tokunaga; Tsukasa Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in early stage of endometrial and cervical cancers.

Authors:  Tajossadat Allameh; Vahidehsadat Hashemi; Fereshteh Mohammadizadeh; Fariba Behnamfar
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 3.  Sentinel-lymph-node procedures in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Juan Wang; Fang Fang; Ye-Fei Li
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Application of carbon nanoparticles in laparoscopic sentinel lymph node detection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yan Lu; Jin-Ying Wei; De-Sheng Yao; Zhong-Mian Pan; Yao Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in uterine cervical cancer patients: ready for clinical use? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viktoria-Varvara Palla; Georgios Karaolanis; Demetrios Moris; Aristides Antsaklis
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2014-01-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.