Literature DB >> 22622905

Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis using Navicath for the management of chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation.

Jung Hwan Lee1, Sang Ho Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidural steroid injection has been frequently performed to treat chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation (L-HIVD). However, a considerable number of patients do not achieve pain relief using this method because perineural or epidural adhesions prevent the spread of injectate into the epidural space. Percutaneous adhesiolysis (PA) is thought to be a useful method because it can eliminate the deleterious effects of adhesion.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PA in managing chronic pain due to L-HIVD and the clinical and radiological predictive factors for the effectiveness of PA using NaviCath®. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study
SETTING: Spine hospital
METHODS: From a group of patients diagnosed with L-HIVD, we selected the 86 patients who underwent PA with NaviCath® who had experienced chronic lower back or leg pain for at least 3 months and had failed to respond to anti-inflammatory medications or physical therapy of at least 1 month's duration and fluoroscopy guided transforaminal epidural injection. We recorded the Numeric Rating Scale for back pain (NRS back) and leg pain (NRS leg) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at pretreatment, 2 weeks, and 3 months after treatment. Clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were obtained to assess the possible predictive factors for PA efficacy. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective chart review without a control group.
RESULTS: At 2 weeks after PA, significant improvement was observed in NRS back, NRS leg, and ODI compared with pretreatment. This improvement was maintained until 3 months after treatment. Among 86 patients, 61 (70.9%), 53 (61.6%) and 61 patients (70.9%) showed successful outcomes in NRS back, NRS leg, and ODI at 2 weeks, respectively. Among 74 patients who were followed up at 3 months, 47 (63.5%), 44 patients (59.5%), and 50 patients (67.6%) showed successful results in NRS back, NRS leg, and ODI at 3 months, respectively. A significantly higher proportion of patients with a history of previous lumbar surgery showed unsuccessful results on NRS back, NRS leg, and ODI scores at 2 weeks and 3 months. Co-existence of spinal stenosis was associated with a significantly higher proportion of unsuccessful results in NRS back and ODI at 2 weeks and 3 months, as well as NRS leg at 3 months. Patients with spondylolisthesis also showed a significantly higher proportion of unsuccessful results in NRS and ODI at 2 weeks.
CONCLUSION: PA with NaviCath® showed clinical effectiveness in the treatment of chronic pain due to L-HIVD that was not responsive to transforaminal epidural injection. Previous surgery and the presence of spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis were poor prognostic predictors. This procedure may enable the physician to place the catheter tip and deliver medicine more precisely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22622905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  16 in total

1.  A novel balloon-inflatable catheter for percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis and decompression.

Authors:  Seong Soo Choi; Eun Young Joo; Beom Sang Hwang; Jong Hyuk Lee; Gunn Lee; Jeong Hun Suh; Jeong Gill Leem; Jin Woo Shin
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2014-03-28

2.  Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and recovery in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  Haibo Zou; Zhongshi Li; Houfu Sheng; Mingsheng Tan; Feng Yang; Li Liang; Jingxin Zhao
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  The effects of a forceful transforaminal epidural steroid injection on radicular pain: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jong Min Byun; Hahck Soo Park; Jae Hee Woo; Jin Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Factors for Predicting Favorable Outcome of Percutaneous Epidural Adhesiolysis for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Sang Ho Moon; Jae Il Lee; Hyun Seok Cho; Jin Woo Shin; Won Uk Koh
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Sang Ho Moon; Jun Young Park; Seong-Sik Cho; Hyun-Seok Cho; Jae-Young Lee; Yeon Ju Kim; Seong-Soo Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  The role of percutaneous neurolysis in lumbar disc herniation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Emilija Knezevic; Nebojsa Nick Knezevic; Mahendra R Sanapati; Alan D Kaye; Srinivasa Thota; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 7.  Epidural lysis of adhesions.

Authors:  Frank Lee; David E Jamison; Robert W Hurley; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2013-12-31

Review 8.  Clinical significance of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in the treatment of sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Fu Wang; Ping You Chen; Wei Chang; Fi Qi Zhu; Li Li Xu; Song Lin Wang; Li Ying Chang; Jie Luo; Guang Jian Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Efficacy of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in the Treatment of Lumbar Post Surgery Syndrome.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Kavita N Manchikanti; Christopher G Gharibo; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-03-07

10.  Percutaneous Adhesiolysis Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Chronic Radicular Pain Caused by Lumbar Foraminal Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Yongbum Park; Woo Yong Lee; Jae Ki Ahn; Hee-Seung Nam; Ki Hoon Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.