Literature DB >> 22622786

Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial.

K K Garborg1, M Løberg, J Matre, O Holme, M Kalager, G Hoff, M Bretthauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) is recommended in several countries, but uptake rates are often low. Fear of pain and also time-consuming costly sedation are barriers for colonoscopy, and thus development of colonoscopy equipment that decreases patient discomfort is worthwhile. This randomized controlled trial investigated the performance of an ultrathin colonoscope in CRC screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive participants in a colonoscopy screening trial were randomized to examination with an ultrathin prototype colonoscope or a standard colonoscope. The main outcome measure was pain during the examination. Participants rated pain (no, slight, moderate, severe) using a validated questionnaire.
RESULTS: From 187 enrolled participants (80 women [43 %]), 162 (87 %) responded to the questionnaire. The study groups were similar regarding baseline characteristics. Pain scores were significantly lower in the prototype instrument group compared with the standard group (78 % vs. 29 % of patients with no pain in prototype and standard groups, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 0.11; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.06 - 0.23; P < 0.001). Cecal intubation rate was 98 % in the prototype group and 92 % in the standard group (P = 0.085). Sedation was used in 2 % and 7 % in the prototype and standard groups respectively (P = 0.12). Adenoma detection rate was 13 % in the prototype group vs. 24 % in the standard group (P = 0.052).
CONCLUSION: The new ultrathin Olympus colonoscope decreases patient pain during screening colonoscopy. This feature may improve uptake and patient satisfaction in screening colonoscopy. Further study is needed to evaluate the lower adenoma detection rate. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22622786     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  13 in total

1.  Colonoscopy using a small-caliber colonoscope with passive-bending after incomplete colonoscopy due to sharp angulation or pain.

Authors:  Koichiro Sato; Fumiko Shigiyama; Sayo Ito; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Kenji Tominaga; Takeshi Suzuki; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Passive-bending, short-type single-balloon enteroscope for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Roux-en-Y anastomosis patients.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yamauchi; Mitsuhiro Kida; Kosuke Okuwaki; Shiro Miyazawa; Tomohisa Iwai; Shuko Tokunaga; Miyoko Takezawa; Hiroshi Imaizumi; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Use of anesthesia on the rise in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Basil Al-Awabdy; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-16

4.  Colonoscopy: Sliding into the depths of sedation--is this what we want?

Authors:  Geir Hoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.

Authors:  Koichiro Sato; Sayo Ito; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Koichi Hirahata; Daisuke Hihara; Kenji Tominaga; Ichiro Yasuda; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Time trends in quality indicators of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Volker Moritz; Michael Bretthauer; Øyvind Holme; Morten Wang Fagerland; Magnus Løberg; Tom Glomsaker; Thomas de Lange; Birgitte Seip; Per Sandvei; Geir Hoff
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Considerable Variability of Procedural Sedation and Analgesia Practices for Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures in Europe.

Authors:  Hermanus H B Vaessen; Johannes T A Knape
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28

8.  Efficacy of a small-caliber colonoscope for pain in female patients during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Hamada; Kyosuke Tanaka; Masaki Katsurahara; Noriyuki Horiki; Reiko Yamada; Junya Tsuboi; Misaki Nakamura; Satoshi Tamaru; Tomomi Yamada; Yoshiyuki Takei
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-06-17

9.  Brain measures of nociception using near-infrared spectroscopy in patients undergoing routine screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lino Becerra; Christopher M Aasted; David A Boas; Edward George; Meryem A Yücel; Barry D Kussman; Peter Kelsey; David Borsook
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.926

10.  Pain and sedation during colonoscopy - a never ending story.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.