Literature DB >> 22622701

Treatment of non-culprit lesions detected during primary PCI: long-term follow-up of a randomised clinical trial.

A Ghani1, J-H E Dambrink, A W J van 't Hof, J P Ottervanger, A T M Gosselink, J C A Hoorntje.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding optimal treatment of non-culprit lesions detected during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multi-vessel disease (MVD). We aimed to investigate whether ischaemia-driven early invasive treatment improves the long-term outcome and prevents major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
METHODS: 121 patients with at least one non-culprit lesion were randomised in a 2:1 manner, 80 were randomised to early fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI (invasive group), and 41 to medical treatment (conservative group). The primary endpoint was MACE at 3 years.
RESULTS: Three-year follow-up was available in 119 patients (98.3 %). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the invasive and conservative strategy, 4 patients (3.4 %) died, all in the invasive group (P = 0.29). Re-infarction occurred in 14 patients (11.8 %) in the invasive group versus none in the conservative group (p = 0.002). Re-PCI was performed in 7 patients (8.9 %) in the invasive group and in 13 patients (32.5 %) in the conservative group (P = 0.001). There was no difference in MACE between these two strategies (35.4 vs 35.0 %, p = 0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients with MVD, early FFR-guided additional revascularisation of the non-culprit lesion did not reduce MACE at three-year follow-up compared with a more conservative strategy. The rate of MACE in the invasive group was predominantly driven by death and re-infarction, whereas in the conservative group the rate of MACE was only driven by repeat interventions.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22622701      PMCID: PMC3430767          DOI: 10.1007/s12471-012-0281-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  14 in total

1.  The ARTS study (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study).

Authors:  P W Serruys; F Unger; B A van Hout; M J van den Brand; L A van Herwerden; G A van Es; J J Bonnier; R Simon; J Cremer; A Colombo; C Santoli; M Vandormael; P R Marshall; O Madonna; B G Firth; A Breeman; M A Morel; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Semin Interv Cardiol       Date:  1999-12

2.  A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin; the Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS).

Authors:  D Hasdai; S Behar; L Wallentin; N Danchin; A K Gitt; E Boersma; P M Fioretti; M L Simoons; A Battler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pieter J Vlaar; Karim D Mahmoud; David R Holmes; Gert van Valkenhoef; Hans L Hillege; Iwan C C van der Horst; Felix Zijlstra; Bart J G L de Smet
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Single vs multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty: results of the multicentre randomised HEpacoat for cuLPrit or multivessel stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HELP AMI) Study.

Authors:  Carlo Di Mario; Sansa Mara; Airoldi Flavio; Sheiban Imad; Manari Antonio; Petronio Anna; Piccaluga Emanuela; De Servi Stefano; Ramondo Angelo; Colusso Stefania; Formosa Anna; Cernigliaro Carmelo; Colombo Antonio; Nicoletta Monzini; Maria Antonietta Bonardi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Intervent       Date:  2004

Review 5.  Management of multivessel coronary disease after ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Marzia Lotrionte; Imad Sheiban
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J A Goldstein; D Demetriou; C L Grines; M Pica; M Shoukfeh; W W O'Neill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A randomised trial of target-vessel versus multi-vessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: major adverse cardiac events during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Luigi Politi; Fabio Sgura; Rosario Rossi; Daniel Monopoli; Elisa Guerri; Chiara Leuzzi; Francesca Bursi; Giuseppe Massimo Sangiorgi; Maria Grazia Modena
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Frans Van de Werf; Diego Ardissino; Amadeo Betriu; Dennis V Cokkinos; Erling Falk; Keith A A Fox; Desmond Julian; Maria Lengyel; Franz-Josef Neumann; Witold Ruzyllo; Christian Thygesen; S Richard Underwood; Alec Vahanian; Freek W A Verheugt; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Paul Sorajja; Bernard J Gersh; David A Cox; Michael G McLaughlin; Peter Zimetbaum; Costantino Costantini; Thomas Stuckey; James E Tcheng; Roxana Mehran; Alexandra J Lansky; Cindy L Grines; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Sigmund Silber; Per Albertsson; Francisco F Avilés; Paolo G Camici; Antonio Colombo; Christian Hamm; Erik Jørgensen; Jean Marco; Jan-Erik Nordrehaug; Witold Ruzyllo; Philip Urban; Gregg W Stone; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  25 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of complete revascularization using either angiography-guided or fractional flow reserve-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in non-culprit vessels in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: insights from a study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandre Hideo-Kajita; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Kayode O Kuku; Solomon S Beyene; Viana Azizi; Yael F Meirovich; Gebremedhin D Melaku; Aaphtaab Dheendsa; Echo J Brathwaite; Sameer Desale; Mohammad Soud; Kazuhiro Dan; Yuichi Ozaki; Ron Waksman; Michael Lipinski
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Authors:  Birgit Vogel; Shamir R Mehta; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Network Meta-Analysis of Percutaneous Intervention-Based Revascularization Strategies for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Concomitant Multi-Vessel Disease.

Authors:  Urooj Fatima; Safi U Khan; Olabisi Akanbi; Saket Girotra; Isaac Opoku-Asare
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 4.  Complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization: definitions, assessment and outcomes.

Authors:  Prakriti Gaba; Bernard J Gersh; Ziad A Ali; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Revascularization Strategies in STEMI with Multivessel Disease: Deciding on Culprit Versus Complete-Ad Hoc or Staged.

Authors:  Shalin Patel; Steven R Bailey
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Daniel Y Lu; Ming Zhong; Dmitriy N Feldman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-07

Review 7.  Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi-vessel disease.

Authors:  Claudio A Bravo; Sameer A Hirji; Deepak L Bhatt; Rachna Kataria; David P Faxon; E Magnus Ohman; Kevin L Anderson; Akil I Sidi; Michael H Sketch; Stuart W Zarich; Asishana A Osho; Christian Gluud; Henning Kelbæk; Thomas Engstrøm; Dan Eik Høfsten; James M Brennan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-03

8.  Impact of completeness of revascularisation on long-term outcomes in patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCI: CR versus IR outcomes in multivessel CAD.

Authors:  Pravin Goel; Ankit Sahu; Manas Layek; Roopali Khanna; Prabhakar Mishra
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2021-07

9.  FFR-guided multivessel stenting reduces urgent revascularization compared with infarct-related artery only stenting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ankur Gupta; Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Pankaj Arora; Garima Arora; Arman Qamar; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Complete Revascularization of Stable STEMI Patients Offers a Significant Benefit if Done During the Index PCI, but Not if It's Done as a Staged Procedure.

Authors:  Roberto C Cerrud-Rodriguez; Syed Muhammad Ibrahim Rashid; Karlo A Wiley; Maday Gonzalez; Valeriia A Kosmacheva; Isabella Castillero-Norato; Cornelia Rivera; Pedro Villablanca; Jose Wiley
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.