OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of systemic treatment with linezolid compared with vancomycin on biofilm formation in mechanically ventilated pigs with severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective randomized animal study. SETTING: Departments of Pneumology, Microbiology, and Pharmacy of the Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, and Scientific and Technological Services of the University of Barcelona. SUBJECTS: We prospectively analyzed 70 endotracheal tube samples. Endotracheal tubes were obtained from pigs either untreated (controls, n=20), or treated with vancomycin (n=32) or linezolid (n=18). INTERVENTIONS: The endotracheal tubes were obtained from a previous randomized study in tracheally intubated pigs with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus severe pneumonia, and mechanically ventilated for 69±16 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Distal and medial hemisections of the endotracheal tube were assessed to quantify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus burden, antibiotic biofilm concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography or bioassay, and biofilm thickness through scanning electron microscopy. We found a trend toward a significant variation in biofilm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus burden (log colony-forming unit/mL) among groups (p=.057), and the lowest bacterial burden was found in endotracheal tubes treated with linezolid (1.98±1.68) in comparison with untreated endotracheal tubes (3.72±2.20, p=.045) or those treated with vancomycin (2.97±2.43, p=.286). Biofilm linezolid concentration was 19-fold above the linezolid minimum inhibitory concentration, whereas biofilm vancomycin concentration (1.60±0.91 µg/mL) was consistently below or close to the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration. Biofilm was thicker in the vancomycin group (p=.077). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic treatment with linezolid limits endotracheal tube biofilm development and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus burden. The potential clinical usefulness of linezolid in decreasing the risk of biofilm-related respiratory infections during prolonged tracheal intubation requires further investigation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of systemic treatment with linezolid compared with vancomycin on biofilm formation in mechanically ventilated pigs with severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective randomized animal study. SETTING: Departments of Pneumology, Microbiology, and Pharmacy of the Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, and Scientific and Technological Services of the University of Barcelona. SUBJECTS: We prospectively analyzed 70 endotracheal tube samples. Endotracheal tubes were obtained from pigs either untreated (controls, n=20), or treated with vancomycin (n=32) or linezolid (n=18). INTERVENTIONS: The endotracheal tubes were obtained from a previous randomized study in tracheally intubated pigs with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus severe pneumonia, and mechanically ventilated for 69±16 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Distal and medial hemisections of the endotracheal tube were assessed to quantify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus burden, antibiotic biofilm concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography or bioassay, and biofilm thickness through scanning electron microscopy. We found a trend toward a significant variation in biofilm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus burden (log colony-forming unit/mL) among groups (p=.057), and the lowest bacterial burden was found in endotracheal tubes treated with linezolid (1.98±1.68) in comparison with untreated endotracheal tubes (3.72±2.20, p=.045) or those treated with vancomycin (2.97±2.43, p=.286). Biofilm linezolid concentration was 19-fold above the linezolid minimum inhibitory concentration, whereas biofilm vancomycin concentration (1.60±0.91 µg/mL) was consistently below or close to the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration. Biofilm was thicker in the vancomycin group (p=.077). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic treatment with linezolid limits endotracheal tube biofilm development and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus burden. The potential clinical usefulness of linezolid in decreasing the risk of biofilm-related respiratory infections during prolonged tracheal intubation requires further investigation.
Authors: Raymond Schuch; Babar K Khan; Assaf Raz; Jimmy A Rotolo; Michael Wittekind Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Gianluigi Li Bassi; Laia Fernandez-Barat; Lina Saucedo; Valeria Giunta; Joan Daniel Marti; Otavio Tavares Ranzani; Eli Aguilera Xiol; Montserrat Rigol; Ignasi Roca; Laura Muñoz; Nestor Luque; Mariano Esperatti; Maria Adela Saco; Jose Ramirez; Jordi Vila; Miguel Ferrer; Antoni Torres Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Laia Fernández-Barat; Ana Motos; Otavio T Ranzani; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Elisabet Aguilera Xiol; Tarek Senussi; Chiara Travierso; Chiara Chiurazzi; Francesco Idone; Laura Muñoz; Jordi Vila; Miquel Ferrer; Paolo Pelosi; Francesco Blasi; Massimo Antonelli; Antoni Torres Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2017-09-20
Authors: Alessandra Oliva; Maria Claudia Miele; Dania Al Ismail; Federica Di Timoteo; Massimiliano De Angelis; Luigi Rosa; Antimo Cutone; Mario Venditti; Maria Teresa Mascellino; Piera Valenti; Claudio Maria Mastroianni Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 5.640