OBJECTIVE: Two of the guideline-concordant therapies for severe community-acquired pneumonia are either a beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone or beta-lactam and macrolide. However it is unclear if there is a benefit for one vs. the other for elderly patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. DESIGN: A retrospective population-based cohort study of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. SETTING: Patients admitted to an intensive care unit of any Department of Veterans Affairs hospital during 5-yr period. PATIENTS: We included only those patients>65 yrs of age admitted to the intensive care unit with community-acquired pneumonia who received either beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone or beta-lactam+macrolide antibiotic therapy for pneumonia. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS: We used multilevel regression models to examine the effect of beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone vs. beta-lactam+macrolide on each of the outcomes after adjusting for potential confounders using propensity scores. MAIN RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1,989 patients: 98.5% male and a mean age of 74 yrs. For treatment, 44% of subjects received beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone and 56% received beta-lactam+macrolide. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was 27% for beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone and 24% for beta-lactam+macrolide (p=.11). In the multilevel models, the use of beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.85-1.30). However, the use of beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone was significantly associated with increased mean length of stay (incidence rate ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.27-1.33). CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference for 30-day mortality but did demonstrate an association with increase in length of stay associated with the use of beta-lactam + fluoroquinolone. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most effective antibiotics regimes for patients with severe pneumonia.
OBJECTIVE: Two of the guideline-concordant therapies for severe community-acquired pneumonia are either a beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone or beta-lactam and macrolide. However it is unclear if there is a benefit for one vs. the other for elderly patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. DESIGN: A retrospective population-based cohort study of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. SETTING:Patients admitted to an intensive care unit of any Department of Veterans Affairs hospital during 5-yr period. PATIENTS: We included only those patients>65 yrs of age admitted to the intensive care unit with community-acquired pneumonia who received either beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone or beta-lactam+macrolide antibiotic therapy for pneumonia. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS: We used multilevel regression models to examine the effect of beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone vs. beta-lactam+macrolide on each of the outcomes after adjusting for potential confounders using propensity scores. MAIN RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1,989 patients: 98.5% male and a mean age of 74 yrs. For treatment, 44% of subjects received beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone and 56% received beta-lactam+macrolide. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was 27% for beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone and 24% for beta-lactam+macrolide (p=.11). In the multilevel models, the use of beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.85-1.30). However, the use of beta-lactam+fluoroquinolone was significantly associated with increased mean length of stay (incidence rate ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.27-1.33). CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference for 30-day mortality but did demonstrate an association with increase in length of stay associated with the use of beta-lactam + fluoroquinolone. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most effective antibiotics regimes for patients with severe pneumonia.
Authors: José A Martínez; Juan P Horcajada; Manuel Almela; Francesc Marco; Alex Soriano; Elisa García; Maria Angeles Marco; Antoni Torres; Josep Mensa Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2003-01-31 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Eric M Mortensen; Ethan A Halm; Mary Jo Pugh; Laurel A Copeland; Mark Metersky; Michael J Fine; Christopher S Johnson; Carlos A Alvarez; Christopher R Frei; Chester Good; Marcos I Restrepo; John R Downs; Antonio Anzueto Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrew F Shorr; Marya D Zilberberg; Jason Kan; Justin Hoffman; Scott T Micek; Marin H Kollef Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 2.692