Literature DB >> 22621432

Influence of collector surface composition and water chemistry on the deposition of cerium dioxide nanoparticles: QCM-D and column experiment approaches.

Xuyang Liu1, Gexin Chen, Chunming Su.   

Abstract

The deposition behavior of cerium dioxide (CeO(2)) nanoparticles (NPs) in dilute NaCl solutions was investigated as a function of collector surface composition, pH, ionic strength, and organic matter (OM). Sensors coated separately with silica, iron oxide, and alumina were applied in quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) to examine the effect of these mineral phases on CeO(2) deposition in NaCl solution (1-200 mM). Frequency and dissipation shift followed the order: silica > iron oxide > alumina in 10 mM NaCl at pH 4.0. No significant deposition was observed at pH 6.0 and 8.5 on any of the tested sensors. However, ≥ 94.3% of CeO(2) NPs deposited onto Ottawa sand in columns in 10 mM NaCl at pH 6.0 and 8.5. The inconsistency in the different experimental approaches can be mainly attributed to NP aggregation, surface heterogeneity of Ottawa sand, and flow geometry. In QCM-D experiments, the deposition kinetics was found to be qualitatively consistent with the predictions based on the classical colloidal stability theory. The presence of low levels (1-6 mg/L) of Suwannee River humic acid, fulvic acid, alginate, citric acid, and carboxymethyl cellulose greatly enhanced the stability and mobility of CeO(2) NPs in 1 mM NaCl at pH 6.5. The poor correlation between the transport behavior and electrophoretic mobility of CeO(2) NPs implies that the electrosteric effect of OM was involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22621432     DOI: 10.1021/es300883q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

Review 1.  Deposition of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) on surfaces in aquatic systems: a review of interaction forces, experimental approaches, and influencing factors.

Authors:  Chengxue Ma; Xiaoliu Huangfu; Qiang He; Jun Ma; Ruixing Huang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Long-term Impact of Gold and Platinum on Microbial Diversity in Australian Soils.

Authors:  Sahar Shar; Frank Reith; Andrew S Ball; Esmaeil Shahsavari
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Effects of source and seasonal variations of natural organic matters on the fate and transport of CeO2 nanoparticles in the environment.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Endalkachew Sahle-Demessie; Ashraf Aly Hassan; Jonathan G Pressman; George A Sorial; Changseok Han
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand; Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Elena Semenzin; Bernd Nowack; Neil Hunt; Danail Hristozov; Antonio Marcomini; Muhammad-Adeel Irfan; Araceli Sánchez Jiménez; Robert Landsiedel; Lang Tran; Agnes G Oomen; Peter M J Bos; Kerstin Hund-Rinke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Dynamism of Stimuli-Responsive Nanohybrids: Environmental Implications.

Authors:  Jaime Plazas-Tuttle; Lewis S Rowles; Hao Chen; Joseph H Bisesi; Tara Sabo-Attwood; Navid B Saleh
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.076

6.  Transport of cerium oxide nanoparticles in saturated silica media: influences of operational parameters and aqueous chemical conditions.

Authors:  Zhaohan Zhang; Peng Gao; Ye Qiu; Guohong Liu; Yujie Feng; Mark Wiesner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.