Literature DB >> 22621403

Low-spin versus high-spin ground state in pseudo-octahedral iron complexes.

David N Bowman1, Elena Jakubikova.   

Abstract

Pseudo-octahedral complexes of iron find applications as switches in molecular electronic devices, materials for data storage, and, more recently, as candidates for dye-sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells. Iron, as a first row transition metal, provides a weak ligand-field splitting in an octahedral environment. This results in the presence of low-lying (5)T excited states that, depending on the identity of iron ligands, can become the ground state of the complex. The small energy difference between the low-spin, (1)A, and high-spin, (5)T, states presents a challenge for accurate prediction of their ground state using density functional theory. In this work, we investigate the applicability of the B3LYP functional to the ground state determination of first row transition metal complexes, focusing mainly on Fe(II) polypyridine complexes with ligands of varying ligand field strength. It has been shown previously that B3LYP artificially favors the (5)T state as the ground state of Fe(II) complexes, and the error in the energy differences between the (1)A and (5)T states is systematic for a set of structurally related complexes. We demonstrate that structurally related complexes can be defined as pseudo-octahedral complexes that undergo similar distortion in the metal-ligand coordination environment between the high-spin and low-spin states. The systematic behavior of complexes with similar distortion can be exploited, and the ground state of an arbitrary Fe(II) complex can be determined by comparing the calculated energy differences between the singlet and quintet electronic states of a complex to the energy differences of structurally related complexes with a known, experimentally determined ground state.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22621403     DOI: 10.1021/ic202344w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  8 in total

1.  Spin Interconversion of Heme-Peroxo-Copper Complexes Facilitated by Intramolecular Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions.

Authors:  Andrew W Schaefer; Melanie A Ehudin; David A Quist; Joel A Tang; Kenneth D Karlin; Edward I Solomon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Tracking the picosecond deactivation dynamics of a photoexcited iron carbene complex by time-resolved X-ray scattering.

Authors:  Denis Leshchev; Tobias C B Harlang; Lisa A Fredin; Dmitry Khakhulin; Yizhu Liu; Elisa Biasin; Mads G Laursen; Gemma E Newby; Kristoffer Haldrup; Martin M Nielsen; Kenneth Wärnmark; Villy Sundström; Petter Persson; Kasper S Kjær; Michael Wulff
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 9.825

3.  Predicting electronic structure properties of transition metal complexes with neural networks.

Authors:  Jon Paul Janet; Heather J Kulik
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 9.825

4.  Activation of ammonia and hydrazine by electron rich Fe(ii) complexes supported by a dianionic pentadentate ligand platform through a common terminal Fe(iii) amido intermediate.

Authors:  Lucie Nurdin; Yan Yang; Peter G N Neate; Warren E Piers; Laurent Maron; Michael L Neidig; Jian-Bin Lin; Benjamin S Gelfand
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  Molecular Modeling Study toward Development of H2S-Free Removal of Iron Sulfide Scale from Oil and Gas Wells.

Authors:  Wim Buijs; Ibnelwaleed A Hussein; Mohamed Mahmoud; Abdulmujeeb T Onawole; Mohammed A Saad; Golibjon R Berdiyorov
Journal:  Ind Eng Chem Res       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.720

6.  Thermally-Induced Spin Crossover and LIESST Effect in the Neutral [FeII(Mebik)2(NCX)2] Complexes: Variable-Temperature Structural, Magnetic, and Optical Studies (X = S, Se; Mebik = bis(1-methylimidazol-2-yl)ketone).

Authors:  Siddhartha De; Lise-Marie Chamoreau; Hasnaa El Said; Yanling Li; Alexandrine Flambard; Marie-Laure Boillot; Subrata Tewary; Gopalan Rajaraman; Rodrigue Lescouëzec
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.221

7.  Seeing Is Believing: Experimental Spin States from Machine Learning Model Structure Predictions.

Authors:  Michael G Taylor; Tzuhsiung Yang; Sean Lin; Aditya Nandy; Jon Paul Janet; Chenru Duan; Heather J Kulik
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  A Review of Density Functional Models for the Description of Fe(II) Spin-Crossover Complexes.

Authors:  Anton Römer; Lukas Hasecke; Peter Blöchl; Ricardo A Mata
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.