Literature DB >> 22621391

Is spinal manipulation effective for pain? An overview of systematic reviews.

Paul Posadzki1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article is aimed at critically evaluating the evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) of spinal manipulation in patients with pain.
DESIGN: The study was designed as a SR of SRs.
METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant articles of the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for pain. SRs were defined as articles employing a repeatable methods section.
RESULTS: Twenty-two SRs relating to the following pain conditions: low back pain (N = 6), headache (N = 5), neck pain (N = 4), any medical problem (N = 1), carpal tunnel syndrome (N = 1), dysmenorrhea (N = 1), fibromyalgia (N = 1), lateral epicondylitis (N = 1), musculoskeletal conditions (N = 1) and nonspinal pain (N = 1), were included. Positive or, for multiple SR, unanimously positive conclusions were drawn for none of the conditions mentioned earlier. LIMITATION: Publication bias as a well-known phenomenon may have been inherited in this article.
CONCLUSION: Collectively, these data fail to demonstrate that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for pain management. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22621391     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01397.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  7 in total

1.  Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain.

Authors:  Megan A Manning; G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Response to Schwerla.

Authors:  Paul Posadzki; Edzard Ernst
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Response.

Authors:  G Michael Allan; Megan A Manning
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Role of rehabilitation medicine and physical agents in the treatment of cancer-associated pain.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Jeffrey R Basford
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Myofascial low back pain treatment.

Authors:  Deepak Sharan; Joshua Samuel Rajkumar; Mathankumar Mohandoss; Rameshkumar Ranganathan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-09

6.  A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta-research study of research waste.

Authors:  Carole Lunny; Emma K Reid; Trish Neelakant; Alyssa Chen; Jia He Zhang; Gavindeep Shinger; Adrienne Stevens; Sara Tasnim; Shadi Sadeghipouya; Stephen Adams; Yi Wen Zheng; Lester Lin; Pei Hsuan Yang; Manpreet Dosanjh; Peter Ngsee; Ursula Ellis; Beverley J Shea; James M Wright
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Belief reinforcement: one reason why costs for low back pain have not decreased.

Authors:  Max Zusman
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-05-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.