Literature DB >> 22621170

Experimental quantification of anion-π interactions in solution using neutral host-guest model systems.

Pablo Ballester1.   

Abstract

Chemical intuition suggests that anions and π-aromatic systems would repel each other. Typically, we think of cations as being attracted to electron-rich π-systems of aromatic rings, and the cation-π interaction, a well-established noncovalent interaction, plays an important role in nature. Therefore the anion-π interaction can be considered the opposite of the cation-π interaction. Computational studies of simple models of anion-π interactions have provided estimates of the factors that govern the binding geometry and the binding energy, leading to a general consensus about the nature of these interactions. In order to attract an anion, the charge distribution of the aromatic system has to be reversed, usually through the decoration of the aromatic systems with strongly electron-withdrawing groups. Researchers have little doubt about the existence of attractive anion-π interactions in the gas phase and in the solid state. The bonding energies assigned to anion-π interactions from quantum chemical calculations and gas phase experiments are significant and compare well with the values obtained for cation-π interactions. In solution, however, there are few examples of attractive anion-π interactions. In this Account, I describe several examples of neutral molecular receptors that bind anions in solution either solely through anion-π interactions or as a combination of anion-π interactions and hydrogen bonding. In the latter cases, the strength of the anion-π interaction is indirectly detected as a modulation of the stronger hydrogen bonding interaction (enforced proximity). The dissection of the energy contribution of the anion-π interaction to the overall binding is complex, which requires the use of appropriate reference systems. This Account gives an overview the experimental efforts to determine the binding energies that can be expected from anion-π interactions in solution with examples that center around the recognition of halides. The studies show that anion-π interactions also exist in solution, and the free energy of binding estimated for these attractive interactions is less than 1 kcal/mol for each substituted phenyl groups. The quantification of anion-π interactions in solution relies on the use of molecular recognition model systems; therefore researchers need to consider how the structure of the model system can alter the magnitude of the observed energy values. In addition, the recognition of anions in solution requires the use of salts (ion pairs) as precursors, which complicates the analysis of the titration data and the corresponding estimate of the binding strength. In solution, the weak binding energies suggest that anion-π interactions are not as significant for the selective or enhanced binding of anions but offer potential applications in catalysis and transport within functional synthetic and biological systems.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22621170     DOI: 10.1021/ar300080f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  17 in total

1.  Theoretical study of interactions between electron-deficient arenes and coinage metal anions.

Authors:  Yishan Chen; Fan Wang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Anion-π interactions in complexes of proteins and halogen-containing amino acids.

Authors:  Sunčica Z Borozan; Mario V Zlatović; Srđan Đ Stojanović
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Do CH-Anion and Anion-π Interactions Alter the Mechanism of 2:1 Host-Guest Complexation in Arylethynyl Monourea Anion Receptors?

Authors:  Lisa M Eytel; Annie K Gilbert; Paul Görner; Lev N Zakharov; Darren W Johnson; Michael M Haley
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Theoretical study of X⁻ · 1 · YF (1 = triazine, X = Cl, Br and I, Y = H, Cl, Br, I, PH₂ and AsH₂): noncovalently electron-withdrawing effects on anion-arene interactions.

Authors:  Yishan Chen; Lifeng Yao
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Substituent Effects in CH Hydrogen Bond Interactions: Linear Free Energy Relationships and Influence of Anions.

Authors:  Blakely W Tresca; Ryan J Hansen; Calvin V Chau; Benjamin P Hay; Lev N Zakharov; Michael M Haley; Darren W Johnson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Anion-π Catalysis Enabled by the Mechanical Bond.

Authors:  John R J Maynard; Bartomeu Galmés; Athanasios D Stergiou; Mark D Symes; Antonio Frontera; Stephen M Goldup
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 16.823

7.  Anion-π Enzymes.

Authors:  Yoann Cotelle; Vincent Lebrun; Naomi Sakai; Thomas R Ward; Stefan Matile
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 14.553

8.  Core-Substituted Naphthalenediimides: LUMO Levels Revisited, in Comparison with Preylenediimides with Sulfur Redox Switches in the Core.

Authors:  François N Miros; Stefan Matile
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.911

9.  Reconciling experiment and theory in the use of aryl-extended calix[4]pyrrole receptors for the experimental quantification of chloride-π interactions in solution.

Authors:  Antonio Bauzá; David Quiñonero; Antonio Frontera; Pablo Ballester
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Supramolecular interactions of terpyridine-derived cores of metallomesogen precursors.

Authors:  Young Hoon Lee; Jack M Harrowfield; Jong Won Shin; Mi Seon Won; Elisabeth Rukmini; Shinya Hayami; Kil Sik Min; Yang Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.