Literature DB >> 22619751

Does natural selection favour the Rescorla-Wagner rule?

Pete C Trimmer1, John M McNamara, Alasdair I Houston, James A R Marshall.   

Abstract

A fundamental question relating to animal behaviour is how animals learn; in particular, how they come to associate stimuli with rewards. Numerous empirical findings can be explained by assuming that animals use some mechanism similar to the Rescorla-Wagner learning rule, which is a relatively simple and highly general method of updating the associative strength between different stimuli. However, the Rescorla-Wagner rule is often not optimal, which raises the question of why a rule with such properties should have evolved. We consider the evolution of learning rules in a simple environment where there exists an optimal rule of similar complexity to the Rescorla-Wagner rule. We show that because the Rescorla-Wagner rule is less sensitive to changes in its parameters than the optimal rule, there is a wider range of parameter values over which the rule structure is initially viable. Consequently, the Rescorla-Wagner rule can be favoured by natural selection, ahead of other rules which are more accurate.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22619751     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  17 in total

1.  The role of beginner's luck in learning to prefer risky patches by socially foraging house sparrows.

Authors:  Tomer Ilan; Edith Katsnelson; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Evolution of protolinguistic abilities as a by-product of learning to forage in structured environments.

Authors:  Oren Kolodny; Shimon Edelman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Collective learning from individual experiences and information transfer during group foraging.

Authors:  Andrea Falcón-Cortés; Denis Boyer; Gabriel Ramos-Fernández
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  The evolution of cognitive mechanisms in response to cultural innovations.

Authors:  Arnon Lotem; Joseph Y Halpern; Shimon Edelman; Oren Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Associative learning and animal cognition.

Authors:  Anthony Dickinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The evolution of continuous learning of the structure of the environment.

Authors:  Oren Kolodny; Shimon Edelman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Constructive anthropomorphism: a functional evolutionary approach to the study of human-like cognitive mechanisms in animals.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Co-Evolution of Social Learning and Evolutionary Preparedness in Dangerous Environments.

Authors:  Björn Lindström; Ida Selbing; Andreas Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The power of associative learning and the ontogeny of optimal behaviour.

Authors:  Magnus Enquist; Johan Lind; Stefano Ghirlanda
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Collective learning and optimal consensus decisions in social animal groups.

Authors:  Albert B Kao; Noam Miller; Colin Torney; Andrew Hartnett; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.