Literature DB >> 2261971

The role of PEEP in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during assisted ventilation.

A Rossi1, R Brandolese, J Milic-Emili, S B Gottfried.   

Abstract

In patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) can significantly increase workload for ventilation. It has been suggested that, in the presence of expiratory flow limitation, application of low levels of PEEP by the ventilator can be used to reduce PEEPi and therefore the magnitude of the inspiratory effort during assisted mechanical ventilation (or pressure support) and weaning. Clearly, pulmonary hyperinflation should not be further enhanced in order not to counteract the beneficial effect of removing PEEPi by decreasing respiratory muscle length and force. This use of PEEP in COPD patients is supported not only by theory, but also by recent experimental work, although sufficient clinical information is not yet available to provide a guideline for titration of the PEEP level. Therefore, application of PEEP in COPD patients requires close monitoring of the end-expiratory lung volume. This can be accomplished, among other noninvasive ways (e.g. the inductive plethysmography), by inspection of flow/volume curves during application of increasing levels of PEEP. The shape of the expiratory limb of the flow/volume curve can also suggest the presence of dynamic hyperinflation and expiratory flow limitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2261971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  7 in total

1.  What is the "best PEEP" in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Authors:  H Wrigge; C Putensen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Paradoxical responses to positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with airway obstruction during controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Maria Paula Caramez; Joao B Borges; Mauro R Tucci; Valdelis N Okamoto; Carlos R R Carvalho; Robert M Kacmarek; Atul Malhotra; Irineu Tadeu Velasco; Marcelo B P Amato
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi).

Authors:  A Rossi; G Polese; G Brandi; G Conti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Renders Spontaneous Effort Noninjurious.

Authors:  Caio C A Morais; Yukiko Koyama; Takeshi Yoshida; Glauco M Plens; Susimeire Gomes; Cristhiano A S Lima; Ozires P S Ramos; Sérgio M Pereira; Naomasa Kawaguchi; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Akinori Uchiyama; João B Borges; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Mauro R Tucci; Marcelo B P Amato; Brian P Kavanagh; Eduardo L V Costa; Yuji Fujino
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Effects of extrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure on mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dynamic hyperinflation.

Authors:  D Georgopoulos; E Giannouli; D Patakas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Neural versus pneumatic control of pressure support in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases at different levels of positive end expiratory pressure: a physiological study.

Authors:  Ling Liu; Feiping Xia; Yi Yang; Federico Longhini; Paolo Navalesi; Jennifer Beck; Christer Sinderby; Haibo Qiu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Non-interventional monitoring of expiratory flow limitation during experimental mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Giorgos Marinakis; Michael Paraschos; Maria Patrani; Theodoros Tsoutsouras; Miltos Vassiliou
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-01-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.