Sun Young Kim1, Hae-Young L Park, Chan Kee Park. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We compared the diagnostic ability of Stratus and Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT) in optic nerve head (ONH) analysis, and examined the effects of optic disc size and peripapillary atrophy (PPA) on their diagnostic capacity. METHODS: Stratus and Cirrus OCT was performed in 28 control and 78 glaucomatous eyes. ONH parameters and diagnostic capacity calculated from the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were compared between the two modalities. Glaucomatous eyes were classified by optic disc size and the presence/absence of PPA, and their AUCs were compared. RESULTS: Rim area (AUC 0.936) and rim volume (AUC 0.824) showed the best diagnostic capacity in Cirrus and Stratus OCT, respectively. Cirrus OCT showed greater diagnostic ability over Stratus OCT for all ONH parameters. With increasing ONH size, diagnostic ability declined in rim and disc areas, while it improved in average cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), vertical CDR, and cup volume for both modalities. Optic disc size as measured by Stratus OCT was significantly larger than that by Cirrus OCT in glaucomatous eyes with PPA. In addition, the diagnostic capacity of all ONH parameters declined significantly for glaucomatous eyes with PPA, especially for Stratus OCT. In Cirrus OCT, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness showed poorer diagnostic ability than rim area in the glaucoma with PPA group. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic capacity of Cirrus OCT was superior to that of Stratus OCT. Considering the principle of determining the disc margin, as Stratus OCT tends to make excessive measurements of the optic disc in PPA, caution is required in analyzing the results.
PURPOSE: We compared the diagnostic ability of Stratus and Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT) in optic nerve head (ONH) analysis, and examined the effects of optic disc size and peripapillary atrophy (PPA) on their diagnostic capacity. METHODS: Stratus and Cirrus OCT was performed in 28 control and 78 glaucomatous eyes. ONH parameters and diagnostic capacity calculated from the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were compared between the two modalities. Glaucomatous eyes were classified by optic disc size and the presence/absence of PPA, and their AUCs were compared. RESULTS: Rim area (AUC 0.936) and rim volume (AUC 0.824) showed the best diagnostic capacity in Cirrus and Stratus OCT, respectively. Cirrus OCT showed greater diagnostic ability over Stratus OCT for all ONH parameters. With increasing ONH size, diagnostic ability declined in rim and disc areas, while it improved in average cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), vertical CDR, and cup volume for both modalities. Optic disc size as measured by Stratus OCT was significantly larger than that by Cirrus OCT in glaucomatous eyes with PPA. In addition, the diagnostic capacity of all ONH parameters declined significantly for glaucomatous eyes with PPA, especially for Stratus OCT. In Cirrus OCT, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness showed poorer diagnostic ability than rim area in the glaucoma with PPA group. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic capacity of Cirrus OCT was superior to that of Stratus OCT. Considering the principle of determining the disc margin, as Stratus OCT tends to make excessive measurements of the optic disc in PPA, caution is required in analyzing the results.
Authors: Huseyin Simavli; Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; Christian J Que; Yingna Liu; Mustafa Akduman; Edem Tsikata; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Kenneth C Fan; Edem Tsikata; Ziad Khoueir; Huseyin Simavli; Rong Guo; Regina A de Luna; Sumir Pandit; Christian J Que; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Huseyin Simavli; Christian John Que; Mustafa Akduman; Jennifer L Rizzo; Edem Tsikata; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Harsha L Rao; Uday K Addepalli; Ravi K Yadav; Nikhil S Choudhari; Sirisha Senthil; Chandra S Garudadri Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yingna Liu; Firas Jassim; Boy Braaf; Ziad Khoueir; Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; Geulah S Ben-David; Georgia Papadogeorgou; Edem Tsikata; Huseyin Simavli; Christian Que; Ramon Lee; Eric Shieh; Benjamin J Vakoc; Brett E Bouma; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.503