Literature DB >> 22618240

Biosurfactants: a sustainable replacement for chemical surfactants?

Roger Marchant1, Ibrahim M Banat.   

Abstract

Glycolipid biosurfactants produced by bacteria and yeasts provide significant opportunities to replace chemical surfactants with sustainable biologically produced alternatives in bulk commercial products such as laundry detergents and surface cleaners. Sophorolipids are already available in sufficient yield to make their use feasible while rhamnolipids and mannosylerythritol lipids require further development. The ability to tailor the biosurfactant produced to the specific needs of the product formulation will be an important future step.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22618240     DOI: 10.1007/s10529-012-0956-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Lett        ISSN: 0141-5492            Impact factor:   2.461


  52 in total

1.  Unraveling the Differential Aggregation of Anionic and Nonionic Monorhamnolipids at Air-Water and Oil-Water Interfaces: A Classical Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study.

Authors:  Elango Munusamy; Charles M Luft; Jeanne E Pemberton; Steven D Schwartz
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Evolution of Aggregate Structure in Solutions of Anionic Monorhamnolipids: Experimental and Computational Results.

Authors:  Ryan J Eismin; Elango Munusamy; Laurel L Kegel; David E Hogan; Raina M Maier; Steven D Schwartz; Jeanne E Pemberton
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.882

3.  Computational study of elements of stability of a four-helix bundle protein biosurfactant.

Authors:  Andrea Schaller; Natalie K Connors; Mirjana Dimitrijev Dwyer; Stefan A Oelmeier; Jürgen Hubbuch; Anton P J Middelberg
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Seeking faster, alternative methods for glycolipid biosurfactant characterization and purification.

Authors:  Maïssa Dardouri; Rita M Mendes; Johannes Frenzel; Judite Costa; Isabel A C Ribeiro
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  The influence of agitation on oil substrate dispersion and oxygen transfer in Pseudomonas aeruginosa USM-AR2 fermentation producing rhamnolipid in a stirred tank bioreactor.

Authors:  M N Nur Asshifa; Nor Syafirah Zambry; M S Salwa; Ahmad R M Yahya
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Medium factors on anaerobic production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa SG and a simplifying medium for in situ microbial enhanced oil recovery applications.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jidong Zhou; Siqin Han; Fang Ma; Ying Zhang; Jie Zhang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Microbial treatment for prevention and removal of paraffin deposition on the walls of crude pipelines.

Authors:  Jiang Hong Liu; Yun Peng Jia; Yi Tong Chen; Rui Dan Xu
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.461

8.  Structural Properties of Nonionic Monorhamnolipid Aggregates in Water Studied by Classical Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Elango Munusamy; Charles M Luft; Jeanne E Pemberton; Steven D Schwartz
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Synergetic effect of rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa C1501 and phytotoxic metabolite from Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae C1136 on Amaranthus hybridus L. and Echinochloa crus-galli weeds.

Authors:  Charles Adetunji; Julius Oloke; Anil Kumar; Singh Swaranjit; Benjamin Akpor
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Assessment of Rheological Behaviour of Water-in-Oil Emulsions Mediated by Glycolipid Biosurfactant Produced by Bacillus megaterium SPSW1001.

Authors:  Varsha Singh; Zairah Waris; Ibrahim M Banat; Sriparna Saha; Padmini Padmanabhan
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.