BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is the most common orthopaedic procedure and is often carried out to treat a degenerative meniscal lesion. The purpose of the present study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) for patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative meniscal tear. METHODS: Four hundred and eighty-five patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative meniscal tear were included. Two groups of patients were formed: one consisted of 385 patients for the purpose of psychometric testing of the WOMET and the other consisted of 100 patients for the assessment of criterion validity. The reliability of the WOMET questionnaire was assessed by determining both internal consistency and test-retest repeatability; for the latter, a subgroup of forty patients completed the form two weeks preoperatively and again on the day of the operation. Validity assessment included determination of content validity (floor and ceiling effects), criterion validity (completion of the WOMET, the Lysholm knee score, and a generic quality-of-life questionnaire by a group of 100 patients), and construct validity (hypothesis testing). Finally, the responsiveness of the WOMET was determined with two successive assessments (on the day of surgery and six months postoperatively). RESULTS: The WOMET showed acceptable internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, criterion validity (agreement with both Lysholm and 15-D scores), and construct validity (all hypotheses were significant). The WOMET was also found to be responsive to change. CONCLUSION: The WOMET score demonstrated acceptable psychometric performance as a patient-administered outcome measure for patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative meniscal tear.
BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is the most common orthopaedic procedure and is often carried out to treat a degenerative meniscal lesion. The purpose of the present study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) for patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative meniscal tear. METHODS: Four hundred and eighty-five patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative meniscal tear were included. Two groups of patients were formed: one consisted of 385 patients for the purpose of psychometric testing of the WOMET and the other consisted of 100 patients for the assessment of criterion validity. The reliability of the WOMET questionnaire was assessed by determining both internal consistency and test-retest repeatability; for the latter, a subgroup of forty patients completed the form two weeks preoperatively and again on the day of the operation. Validity assessment included determination of content validity (floor and ceiling effects), criterion validity (completion of the WOMET, the Lysholm knee score, and a generic quality-of-life questionnaire by a group of 100 patients), and construct validity (hypothesis testing). Finally, the responsiveness of the WOMET was determined with two successive assessments (on the day of surgery and six months postoperatively). RESULTS: The WOMET showed acceptable internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, criterion validity (agreement with both Lysholm and 15-D scores), and construct validity (all hypotheses were significant). The WOMET was also found to be responsive to change. CONCLUSION: The WOMET score demonstrated acceptable psychometric performance as a patient-administered outcome measure for patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative meniscal tear.
Authors: Søren Thorgaard Skou; Martin Lind; Per Hölmich; Hans Peter Jensen; Carsten Jensen; Muhammad Afzal; Uffe Jørgensen; Jonas Bloch Thorlund Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Raine Sihvonen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara; Ari Itälä; Antti Joukainen; Heikki Nurmi; Juha Kalske; Anna Ikonen; Timo Järvelä; Tero A H Järvinen; Kari Kanto; Janne Karhunen; Jani Knifsund; Heikki Kröger; Tommi Kääriäinen; Janne Lehtinen; Jukka Nyrhinen; Juha Paloneva; Outi Päiväniemi; Marko Raivio; Janne Sahlman; Roope Sarvilinna; Sikri Tukiainen; Ville-Valtteri Välimäki; Ville Äärimaa; Pirjo Toivonen; Teppo L N Järvinen Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Raine Sihvonen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara; Ari Itälä; Antti Joukainen; Juha Kalske; Heikki Nurmi; Jaanika Kumm; Niko Sillanpää; Tommi Kiekara; Aleksandra Turkiewicz; Pirjo Toivonen; Martin Englund; Simo Taimela; Teppo L N Järvinen Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 13.800