Literature DB >> 22617931

Validation of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) for patients with a degenerative meniscal tear: a meniscal pathology-specific quality-of-life index.

Raine Sihvonen1, Timo Järvelä, Heikki Aho, Teppo L N Järvinen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is the most common orthopaedic procedure and is often carried out to treat a degenerative meniscal lesion. The purpose of the present study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) for patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative meniscal tear.
METHODS: Four hundred and eighty-five patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative meniscal tear were included. Two groups of patients were formed: one consisted of 385 patients for the purpose of psychometric testing of the WOMET and the other consisted of 100 patients for the assessment of criterion validity. The reliability of the WOMET questionnaire was assessed by determining both internal consistency and test-retest repeatability; for the latter, a subgroup of forty patients completed the form two weeks preoperatively and again on the day of the operation. Validity assessment included determination of content validity (floor and ceiling effects), criterion validity (completion of the WOMET, the Lysholm knee score, and a generic quality-of-life questionnaire by a group of 100 patients), and construct validity (hypothesis testing). Finally, the responsiveness of the WOMET was determined with two successive assessments (on the day of surgery and six months postoperatively).
RESULTS: The WOMET showed acceptable internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, criterion validity (agreement with both Lysholm and 15-D scores), and construct validity (all hypotheses were significant). The WOMET was also found to be responsive to change.
CONCLUSION: The WOMET score demonstrated acceptable psychometric performance as a patient-administered outcome measure for patients with an arthroscopically verified degenerative meniscal tear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22617931     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  11 in total

1.  Translation, validation, and cross-cultural adaption of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) into German.

Authors:  M Sgroi; M Däxle; S Kocak; H Reichel; T Kappe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET).

Authors:  Derya Celik; Murat Demirel; Gamze Kuş; Mehmet Erdil; Arzu Razak Özdinçler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of meniscal surgery compared with exercise and patient education for treatment of meniscal tears in young adults.

Authors:  Søren Thorgaard Skou; Martin Lind; Per Hölmich; Hans Peter Jensen; Carsten Jensen; Muhammad Afzal; Uffe Jørgensen; Jonas Bloch Thorlund
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus placebo surgery for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 2-year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Raine Sihvonen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara; Ari Itälä; Antti Joukainen; Heikki Nurmi; Juha Kalske; Anna Ikonen; Timo Järvelä; Tero A H Järvinen; Kari Kanto; Janne Karhunen; Jani Knifsund; Heikki Kröger; Tommi Kääriäinen; Janne Lehtinen; Jukka Nyrhinen; Juha Paloneva; Outi Päiväniemi; Marko Raivio; Janne Sahlman; Roope Sarvilinna; Sikri Tukiainen; Ville-Valtteri Välimäki; Ville Äärimaa; Pirjo Toivonen; Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Patient-reported outcome measures for patients with meniscal tears: a systematic review of measurement properties and evaluation with the COSMIN checklist.

Authors:  Simon G F Abram; Robert Middleton; David J Beard; Andrew J Price; Sally Hopewell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study (FIDELITY): a protocol for a randomised, placebo surgery controlled trial on the efficacy of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for patients with degenerative meniscus injury with a novel 'RCT within-a-cohort' study design.

Authors:  Raine Sihvonen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara; Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Development of a Chinese version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  W W Tong; W Wang; W D Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Comparison of 3 Knee-Specific Quality-of-Life Instruments for Patients With Meniscal Tears.

Authors:  Mirco Sgroi; Semra Kocak; Heiko Reichel; Thomas Kappe
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-01-12

9.  Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist.

Authors:  Naghmeh Ebrahimi; Soofia Naghdi; Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari; Shohreh Jalaie; Nasser Salsabili
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 5 year follow-up of the placebo-surgery controlled FIDELITY (Finnish Degenerative Meniscus Lesion Study) trial.

Authors:  Raine Sihvonen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara; Ari Itälä; Antti Joukainen; Juha Kalske; Heikki Nurmi; Jaanika Kumm; Niko Sillanpää; Tommi Kiekara; Aleksandra Turkiewicz; Pirjo Toivonen; Martin Englund; Simo Taimela; Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.