Literature DB >> 22617852

COMT x DRD4 epistasis impacts prefrontal cortex function underlying response control.

Sebastian Heinzel1, Thomas Dresler, Christina G Baehne, Monika Heine, Andrea Boreatti-Hümmer, Christian P Jacob, Tobias J Renner, Andreas Reif, Klaus-Peter Lesch, Andreas J Fallgatter, Ann-Christine Ehlis.   

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex plays a major role in cognitive control, but it is unclear how single genes and gene-gene interactions (genetic epistasis) impact neural and behavioral phenotypes. Both dopamine (DA) availability ("inverted U-model") and excitatory versus inhibitory DA receptor stimulation ("dual-state theory") have been linked to important principles of prefrontal processing. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT; Val158Met) and DA D4-receptor (DRD4; 48 bp VNTR) genotypes were analyzed for effects on behavioral and neural correlates of prefrontal response control (NoGo-anteriorization, NGA) using a Go-NoGo task and electroencephalography (114 controls and 181 patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder).  DRD4 and COMT epistatically interacted on the NGA, whereas single genes and diagnosis showed no significant impact. Subjects with presumably relatively increased D4-receptor function (DRD4: no 7R-alleles) displayed an inverted U-relationship between the NGA and increasing COMT-dependent DA levels, whereas subjects with decreased D4-sensitivity (7R) showed a U-relationship. This interaction was supported by 7R-allele dose effects and mirrored by reaction time variability (non-significant after multiple testing correction). Combining previous theories of prefrontal DA functioning, neural stability at intermediate DA levels may be accompanied by the risk of overly decreased neural flexibility if inhibitory DA receptor function is additionally decreased. Our findings might help to disentangle the genetic basis of dopaminergic mechanisms underlying prefrontal (dys)function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NoGo-anteriorization; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); dopamine; electroencephalography; genetic epistasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22617852     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  12 in total

Review 1.  Applying imaging genetics to ADHD: the promises and the challenges.

Authors:  Zhaomin Wu; Li Yang; Yufeng Wang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Testing differential susceptibility: Plasticity genes, the social environment, and their interplay in adolescent response inhibition.

Authors:  Jennifer S Richards; Alejandro Arias Vásquez; Daan van Rooij; Dennis van der Meer; Barbara Franke; Pieter J Hoekstra; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Jaap Oosterlaan; Stephen V Faraone; Catharina A Hartman; Jan K Buitelaar
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Influence of a latrophilin 3 (LPHN3) risk haplotype on event-related potential measures of cognitive response control in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Andreas J Fallgatter; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Thomas Dresler; Andreas Reif; Christian P Jacob; Mauricio Arcos-Burgos; Maximilian Muenke; Klaus-Peter Lesch
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.600

4.  Neural correlates of inhibitory control and functional genetic variation in the dopamine D4 receptor gene.

Authors:  Richard C Mulligan; Sean D Kristjansson; Angela M Reiersen; Andres S Parra; Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Imaging genetics in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a way towards pathophysiological understanding?

Authors:  Thomas Dresler; Beatrix Barth; Thomas Ethofer; Klaus-Peter Lesch; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Andreas J Fallgatter
Journal:  Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul       Date:  2014-05-12

6.  Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.

Authors:  Pingyuan Gong; Guomin Shen; She Li; Guoping Zhang; Hongchao Fang; Lin Lei; Peizhe Zhang; Fuchang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Behavioral changes following PCB 153 exposure in the spontaneously hypertensive rat - an animal model of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Espen Borgå Johansen; Frode Fonnum; Per L Lausund; S Ivar Walaas; Nora Elise Bærland; Grete Wøien; Terje Sagvolden
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.759

8.  Sex differences in COMT polymorphism effects on prefrontal inhibitory control in adolescence.

Authors:  Thomas P White; Eva Loth; Katya Rubia; Lydia Krabbendam; Robert Whelan; Tobias Banaschewski; Gareth J Barker; Arun L W Bokde; Christian Büchel; Patricia Conrod; Mira Fauth-Bühler; Herta Flor; Vincent Frouin; Jürgen Gallinat; Hugh Garavan; Penny Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Bernd Ittermann; Claire Lawrence; Karl Mann; Marie-Laure Paillère; Frauke Nees; Tomas Paus; Zdenka Pausova; Marcella Rietschel; Trevor Robbins; Michael N Smolka; Sukhwinder S Shergill; Gunter Schumann
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Catecholaminergic gene variants: contribution in ADHD and associated comorbid attributes in the eastern Indian probands.

Authors:  Paramita Ghosh; Kanyakumarika Sarkar; Nipa Bhaduri; Anirban Ray; Keka Sarkar; Swagata Sinha; Kanchan Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Electrophysiological indices of response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task predict self-control in a social context.

Authors:  Kyle Nash; Bastian Schiller; Lorena R R Gianotti; Thomas Baumgartner; Daria Knoch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.