Literature DB >> 22617801

Comparison of reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods and platforms for single cell gene expression analysis.

Bridget C Fox1, Alison S Devonshire, Marc-Olivier Baradez, Damian Marshall, Carole A Foy.   

Abstract

Single cell gene expression analysis can provide insights into development and disease progression by profiling individual cellular responses as opposed to reporting the global average of a population. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the "gold standard" for the quantification of gene expression levels; however, the technical performance of kits and platforms aimed at single cell analysis has not been fully defined in terms of sensitivity and assay comparability. We compared three kits using purification columns (PicoPure) or direct lysis (CellsDirect and Cells-to-CT) combined with a one- or two-step RT-qPCR approach using dilutions of cells and RNA standards to the single cell level. Single cell-level messenger RNA (mRNA) analysis was possible using all three methods, although the precision, linearity, and effect of lysis buffer and cell background differed depending on the approach used. The impact of using a microfluidic qPCR platform versus a standard instrument was investigated for potential variability introduced by preamplification of template or scaling down of the qPCR to nanoliter volumes using laser-dissected single cell samples. The two approaches were found to be comparable. These studies show that accurate gene expression analysis is achievable at the single cell level and highlight the importance of well-validated experimental procedures for low-level mRNA analysis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22617801     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  14 in total

Review 1.  The future is now: single-cell genomics of bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Paul C Blainey
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  RNAi revised--target mRNA-dependent enhancement of gene silencing.

Authors:  Simon Dornseifer; Sarah Willkomm; Rosel Kretschmer-Kazemi Far; Janine Liebschwager; Foteini Beltsiou; Kirsten Frank; Sandra D Laufer; Thomas Martinetz; Georg Sczakiel; Jens Christian Claussen; Tobias Restle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Pre-amplification in the context of high-throughput qPCR gene expression experiment.

Authors:  Vlasta Korenková; Justin Scott; Vendula Novosadová; Marie Jindřichová; Lucie Langerová; David Švec; Monika Šídová; Robert Sjöback
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.946

4.  Concurrent host-pathogen gene expression in the lungs of pigs challenged with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Authors:  Louise Brogaard; Kirstine Klitgaard; Peter M H Heegaard; Mette Sif Hansen; Tim Kåre Jensen; Kerstin Skovgaard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 5.  Considerations for accurate gene expression measurement by reverse transcription quantitative PCR when analysing clinical samples.

Authors:  Rebecca Sanders; Deborah J Mason; Carole A Foy; Jim F Huggett
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Self-digitization microfluidic chip for absolute quantification of mRNA in single cells.

Authors:  Alison M Thompson; Alexander Gansen; Amy L Paguirigan; Jason E Kreutz; Jerald P Radich; Daniel T Chiu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Overview of micro- and nano-technology tools for stem cell applications: micropatterned and microelectronic devices.

Authors:  Stefano Cagnin; Elisa Cimetta; Carlotta Guiducci; Paolo Martini; Gerolamo Lanfranchi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Methods for applying accurate digital PCR analysis on low copy DNA samples.

Authors:  Alexandra S Whale; Simon Cowen; Carole A Foy; Jim F Huggett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An optimised direct lysis method for gene expression studies on low cell numbers.

Authors:  Anh Viet-Phuong Le; Dexing Huang; Tony Blick; Erik W Thompson; Alexander Dobrovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Direct cell lysis for single-cell gene expression profiling.

Authors:  David Svec; Daniel Andersson; Milos Pekny; Robert Sjöback; Mikael Kubista; Anders Ståhlberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.