Literature DB >> 22617591

Placental weight for gestational age and adverse perinatal outcomes.

Jennifer A Hutcheon1, Helen McNamara, Robert W Platt, Alice Benjamin, Michael S Kramer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The fetoplacental ratio has been used conventionally to study the contribution of the placenta to fetal growth restriction. However, this measure is problematic because a normal fetoplacental ratio can reflect birth weight and placental weight that are both normal, both low, or both high. The objective of this study was to examine the independent association between placental weight for gestational age and perinatal mortality or serious neonatal morbidity.
METHODS: A sex- and gestational age-specific placental weight z score was calculated for a cohort of 87,600 singleton births at the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal, Canada, 1978-2007. The relationship between placental weight z score and adverse perinatal outcomes (stillbirth, neonatal death, 5-minute Apgar score lower than 7, seizures, or respiratory morbidity) was examined using logistic regression. Multivariable models examined whether the relationship was independent of birth weight and other pregnancy risk factors.
RESULTS: : After controlling for birth weight, fetuses with a low placental weight z score were at significantly increased risk of stillbirth (odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-2.6, percent population attributable risk 17.8%). In contrast, adverse neonatal outcomes were significantly more likely among those with high placental weight z scores (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7, percent population attributable risk 5% for any serious neonatal morbidity). Similar trends were observed after further adjusting for pregnancy risk factors.
CONCLUSION: Placental weight for gestational age is an independent risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes, above and beyond the known association with birth weight. The mechanisms behind the opposing effects of placental weight z score on risk of stillbirth compared with adverse neonatal outcomes require further elucidation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22617591     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318253d3df

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  22 in total

1.  Population attributable risks of patient, child and organizational risk factors for perinatal mortality in hospital births.

Authors:  Jashvant Poeran; Gerard J J M Borsboom; Johanna P de Graaf; Erwin Birnie; Eric A P Steegers; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-04

2.  Is the fetoplacental ratio a differential marker of fetal growth restriction in small for gestational age infants?

Authors:  Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez; Cande V Ananth; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Romy Gaillard; Paul S Albert; Michael Schomaker; Patrick McElduff; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Bizu Gelaye; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Evaluating maternal exposure to an environmental per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) mixture during pregnancy: Adverse maternal and fetoplacental effects in a New Zealand White (NZW) rabbit model.

Authors:  Christine E Crute; Samantha M Hall; Chelsea D Landon; Angela Garner; Jeffrey I Everitt; Sharon Zhang; Bevin Blake; Didrik Olofsson; Henry Chen; Susan K Murphy; Heather M Stapleton; Liping Feng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 10.753

4.  CHDS: A national treasure that keeps on giving.

Authors:  Suzanne E Fenton; Linda S Birnbaum
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.143

5.  Placental Weight and Male Genital Anomalies: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study.

Authors:  Linn Håkonsen Arendt; Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen; Allen J Wilcox; Tine Brink Henriksen; Jørn Olsen; Morten Søndergaard Lindhard
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Fetal programming and Wilms tumor.

Authors:  Julia E Heck; Di He; Carla Janzen; Noah Federman; Jorn Olsen; Beate Ritz; Johnni Hansen
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Maternal and Cord Blood Hemoglobin as Determinants of Placental Weight: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ferrante S Gragasin; Maria B Ospina; Jesus Serrano-Lomelin; Su Hwan Kim; Matthew Kokotilo; Andrew G Woodman; Stephen J Renaud; Stephane L Bourque
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Offspring birthweight and placental weight-does the type of maternal diabetes matter? A population-based study of 319 076 pregnancies.

Authors:  Ellen M Strøm-Roum; Anne M Jukic; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.544

9.  Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of velamentous and marginal cord insertions: a population-based study of 634,741 pregnancies.

Authors:  Cathrine Ebbing; Torvid Kiserud; Synnøve Lian Johnsen; Susanne Albrechtsen; Svein Rasmussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Birth weight ratio as an alternative to birth weight percentile to express infant weight in research and clinical practice: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Bart Jan Voskamp; Brenda M Kazemier; Ewoud Schuit; Ben Willem J Mol; Maarten Buimer; Eva Pajkrt; Wessel Ganzevoort
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.