| Literature DB >> 22617319 |
.
Abstract
Recent comparison (SAFE study) of a mobile, synchronized compression device and low-molecular-weight heparin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism showed similar efficacy but significant differences in major bleeding. A model was constructed to evaluate any difference in cost-effectiveness between the 2 therapies incorporating rates and probabilities of major bleeding from the SAFE study with published costs for treating those adverse events. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of each therapy was performed and applied to hypothetical patient populations representative of annual health system volume. The model showed a cost-effectiveness advantage of the compression device resulting in a savings of more than $3.69 million in a 10 000-patient cohort. The result was primarily driven by a decrease in the amount of major bleeding, which requires significant health care resources to treat.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22617319 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757