AIMS: To determine the prognostic value of SLNB in patients with thick melanoma in terms of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). METHODS: 136 patients with primary tumours (Breslow thickness ≥ 4.0 mm) underwent SLNB. OS and RFS were calculated and a multivariate Cox regression model used to determine the important prognostic factors for predicting OS and RFS. RESULTS: Median Breslow thickness was 5.5 mm and 60% were ulcerated. Median follow up was 4 years (95% CI = 4-5) with 54 patients having died at the time of analysis. 5-year OS for SLNB positive patients was 32%, compared to 78% for negative patients. The significant predictors of poorer OS were increasing age (p = 0.03), increasing Breslow thickness (p = 0.03) and SLNB positivity (p < 0.0001). 5 year RFS was significantly worse in the SLNB positive population compared to the negative patients (p < 0.0001); 27% versus 66% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a thick melanoma and a positive SLNB have a significantly worse RFS and OS compared to those with a negative SLNB. Over three-quarters of patients with a negative SLNB survived five years. These findings have implications for the subpopulations included in adjuvant therapy trials and we advocate SLNB be recommended in patients with thick melanomas.
AIMS: To determine the prognostic value of SLNB in patients with thick melanoma in terms of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). METHODS: 136 patients with primary tumours (Breslow thickness ≥ 4.0 mm) underwent SLNB. OS and RFS were calculated and a multivariate Cox regression model used to determine the important prognostic factors for predicting OS and RFS. RESULTS: Median Breslow thickness was 5.5 mm and 60% were ulcerated. Median follow up was 4 years (95% CI = 4-5) with 54 patients having died at the time of analysis. 5-year OS for SLNB positive patients was 32%, compared to 78% for negative patients. The significant predictors of poorer OS were increasing age (p = 0.03), increasing Breslow thickness (p = 0.03) and SLNB positivity (p < 0.0001). 5 year RFS was significantly worse in the SLNB positive population compared to the negative patients (p < 0.0001); 27% versus 66% respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with a thick melanoma and a positive SLNB have a significantly worse RFS and OS compared to those with a negative SLNB. Over three-quarters of patients with a negative SLNB survived five years. These findings have implications for the subpopulations included in adjuvant therapy trials and we advocate SLNB be recommended in patients with thick melanomas.
Authors: Dale Han; Gang Han; Monica T Duque; Steven Morrison; Stanley P Leong; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; John Vetto; Richard White; Schlomo Schneebaum; Barbara Pockaj; Nicola Mozzillo; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Marloes Faut; Kevin P Wevers; Robert J van Ginkel; Gilles F H Diercks; Harald J Hoekstra; Schelto Kruijff; Lukas B Been; Barbara L van Leeuwen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Juan Carlos Rodriguez Otero; Maria Susana Dagatti; Ramon Fernandez Bussy; Adriana Bergero; Mario Gorosito; Roberto Staffieri; Roberto Villavicencio; Stella Maris Batalles; Stella Maris Pezzotto Journal: World J Oncol Date: 2019-04-20