| Literature DB >> 22616934 |
Helen Wilson1, Chris Carr, Marei Hacke.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For millennia, iron-tannate dyes have been used to colour ceremonial and domestic objects shades of black, grey, or brown. Surviving iron-tannate dyed objects are part of our cultural heritage but their existence is threatened by the dye itself which can accelerate oxidation and acid hydrolysis of the substrate. This causes many iron-tannate dyed textiles to discolour and decrease in tensile strength and flexibility at a faster rate than equivalent undyed textiles. The current lack of suitable stabilisation treatments means that many historic iron-tannate dyed objects are rapidly crumbling to dust with the knowledge and value they hold being lost forever.This paper describes the production, characterisation, and validation of model iron-tannate dyed textiles as substitutes for historic iron-tannate dyed textiles in the development of stabilisation treatments. Spectrophotometry, surface pH, tensile testing, SEM-EDX, and XRF have been used to characterise the model textiles.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22616934 PMCID: PMC3495704 DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-6-44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Losses to the iron-tannate dyed hair (silk) on a Japanese ceremonial Hina doll (British Museum, Department of Asia, AS1981,0808.227). Image © The Trustees of the British Museum.
Figure 2A Maori (ceremonial skirt), approximately 15 years old, produced from New Zealand flax () (owned by Dr Vincent Daniels).
Figure 3Remains of a Maori cloak and that has disintegrated in the iron-tannate dyed areas (Horniman Museum).
Dye formulations used to produce substitute iron-tannate dyed textiles
| Proteinaceous | p1 | Wool + silk | 200 : 3.23 | 0.02 M FeSO4.7H2O 55°C, 1 hour | 6.5 g.L-1 TA 55°C, 3 hours | 0.009 M FeSO4.7H2O 55°C, 1 hour | A B A B A+ |
| | p2 | Wool + silk | 200 : 3.23 | 0.02 M FeSO4.7H2O + 0.002 M CuSO4.5H2O 55°C, 1 hour | 6.5 g.L-1 TA 55°C, 3 hours | 0.009 M FeSO4.7H2O + 0.0009 M CuSO4.5H2O 55°C, 1 hour | A B A B A+ |
| | p3 | Silk | 200 : 0.62 | 0.005 M FeSO4.7H2O 55°C, 1 hour | 3.5 g.L-1 Gx 55°C, 3 hours | 0.002 M FeSO4.7H2O 55°C, 1 hour | A B A B A+ |
| Cellulosic | c1 | Cotton + abaca | 60 : 2.01 | 15 g.L-1 TA 20°C, 2 hours | 0.04 M FeSO4.7H2O 20°C, 2 hours | - | A B A B A B |
| | c2 | Cotton + abaca | 60 : 2.01 | 15 g.L-1 TA 20°C, 2 hours | 0.04 M FeSO4.7H2O + 0.005 M CuSO4.5H2O 20°C, 2 hours | - | A B A B A B |
| c3 | Cotton | 60 : 1.22 | 16.6 g.L-1 Gx 20°C, 2 hours | 0.024 M FeSO4.7H2O 20°C, 2 hours | - | A B A B A B | |
a. Ratio in litres of dyebath : total mass of fabric in kilograms.
b. Abbreviations are as follows: TA: 50:50 mixture of non-purified and purified tannic acid extracts from Chinese galls and sumac, respectively; Gx: non-purified gall powder.
c. In p1, the final quantity of iron (A+) was added directly to the final dyebath B but in p2 and p3, it was applied in a separate dyebath due to substantial and problematic foam formation in p1. Since an unknown quantity of tannic acid remained in the final dyebath B in p1 when the iron (A+) was added, the effective concentration of iron ions available for binding with tannic acid on or within the textile fibres is lower than that in p2 and p3.
The uniformity of metal ion and colour distribution in unaged substitute textiles determined using XRF and spectrophotometry, respectively
| Wool undyed (WU) | 12 (1)b | 5 (1) | 78.39 (0.39) | −1.06 (0.04) | 6.67 (0.24) |
| Wool dyed with p1 (Wp1) | 590 (60) | 11 (1) | 33.53 (1.03) | 1.31 (0.04) | −1.11 (0.12) |
| Wool dyed with p2 (Wp2) | 786 (68) | 333 (27) | 31.03 (0.79) | 0.93 (0.07) | −1.05 (0.18) |
| Silk undyed (SU) | 17 (2) | 4 (1) | 75.36 (0.36) | −0.20 (0.02) | 0.97 (0.12) |
| Silk dyed with p1 (Sp1) | 2124 (526) | 9 (5) | 20.75 (0.37) | 1.46 (0.03) | −3.90 (0.09) |
| Silk dyed with p2 (Sp2) | 2413 (292) | 204 (26) | 18.76 (0.30) | 1.61 (0.03) | −4.37 (0.07) |
| Silk dyed with p3 (Sp3) | 2628 (145) | 11 (10) | 17.79 (0.20) | 1.38 (0.03) | −4.09 (0.07) |
| Abaca undyed (AU) | 24 (5) | 4 (3) | 74.25 (1.66) | 1.91 (0.41) | 13.56 (1.09) |
| Abaca dyed with c1 (Ac1) | 1459 (338) | 9 (2) | 21.66 (0.75) | 0.56 (0.05) | −2.22 (0.12) |
| Abaca dyed with c2 (Ac2) | 1490 (190) | 371 (53) | 23.34 (0.83) | 0.50 (0.04) | −2.65 (0.17) |
| Cotton undyed (CU) | 15 (1) | 3 (1) | 84.31 (0.51) | −0.26 (0.02) | 0.67 (0.09) |
| Cotton dyed with c1 (Cc1) | 683 (145) | 5 (3) | 35.7 (0.91) | 0.70 (0.06) | −4.33 (0.15) |
| Cotton dyed with c2 (Cc2) | 742 (41) | 83 (11) | 33.58 (0.50) | 0.80 (0.04) | −4.89 (0.12) |
| Cotton dyed with c3 (Cc3) | 1115 (44) | 3 (3) | 29.61 (1.01) | 0.57 (0.05) | −4.62 (0.13) |
| Black silk (1881,0802.158 or PRN: RRM 10294c) | 2370 | 587 | NDd | ND | ND |
| Black dyed North American skin bag (1937,0617.1c) | 4163 | 44 | ND | ND | ND |
| Brown braided area of modern | 1918 | 2 | ND | ND | ND |
| Black fibres of broken Maori cloak and | 5924 | 3 | ND | ND | ND |
a. Iron and copper content ratios (net elemental peak area: net Compton peak area) multiplied by 1000.
b. Standard deviations of mean data are in parentheses.
c. British Museum registration number.
d. Not done because the samples were too small or the surface too uneven for analysis.
Figure 4SEM images and EDX spectra of dyed abaca (A), cotton (B), and silk (C and D) fibres in cross-section. The dyed silk fibres in C are from the interior of the yarn while those in D are on the crown of the weave.
Figure 5SEM image and EDX spectra of a dyed wool fibre near the crown of the weave.
Figure 6Visible reflectance spectra of the unaged cellulosic (A) and proteinaceous (B) substitute textiles.
The surface pH, breaking load, and extension of the unaged substitute textiles and iron-tannate dyed museum objects
| Wool undyed (WU) | 7.46 (0.49)a | NDb | NDb |
| Wool dyed with p1 (Wp1) | 3.91 (0.10) | ND | ND |
| Wool dyed with p2 (Wp2) | 3.84 (0.11) | ND | ND |
| Silk undyed (SU) | 7.24 (0.09) | 70.2 (4.9) | 28.2 (1.7) |
| Silk dyed with p1 (Sp1) | 3.60 (0.06) | 62.9 (4.9) | 25.0 (2.6) |
| Silk dyed with p2 (Sp2) | 3.69 (0.09) | 56.4 (2.5) | 22.9 (1.7) |
| Silk dyed with p3 (Sp3) | 3.57 (0.06) | 55.3 (3.8) | 22.6 (1.6) |
| Abaca undyed (AU) | 5.36 (0.18) | 239.9 (43.1) | 3.9 (0.5) |
| Abaca dyed with c1 (Ac1) | 2.86 (0.07) | 105.9 (18.3) | 2.1 (0.3) |
| Abaca dyed with c2 (Ac2) | 2.67 (0.08) | 130.1 (24.8) | 2.5 (0.5) |
| Cotton undyed (CU) | 6.61 (0.11) | 73.2 (7.7) | 10.5 (1.1) |
| Cotton dyed with c1 (Cc1) | 2.72 (0.06) | 68.3 (5.3) | 6.9 (0.7) |
| Cotton dyed with c2 (Cc2) | 2.65 (0.07) | 51.0 (4.8) | 9.2 (1.3) |
| Cotton dyed with c3 (Cc3) | 2.48 (0.04) | 45.7 (8.6) | 10.2 (1.9) |
| Dyed areas of modern | 3.72 (0.28) | ND | ND |
| Black fibres of broken Maori cloak and | 2.89 (0.19) | ND | ND |
| Black cotton Akali Sikh turban (2005,7-27.1c) | 3.39 | ND | ND |
a. Standard deviations are noted in parentheses when more than one analysis of a sample was taken.
b. Not done due to either slippage of sample in the jaws of the tensile tester (wool samples) or the samples being too small to test (historic samples).
c. British Museum registration number.
Figure 7Effect of accelerated ageing on the breaking load (A) and extension (B) of the substitute textiles.
Changes in colour, tensile breaking load (N), and extension (%) of substitute textiles during accelerated ageing (80°C, 58% RH)
| WU | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NDa | ND |
| | 1 | 1.14 | 0.05 | −0.40 | 1.38 | ND | ND |
| | 2 | 1.33 | 0.32 | −0.48 | 1.58 | ND | ND |
| | 3 | 1.75 | 0.17 | −0.61 | 2.16 | ND | ND |
| | 4 | 2.44 | −0.22 | −0.72 | 3.17 | ND | ND |
| SU | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 70.2 (4.9)b | 28.2 (1.7)b |
| | 1 | 1.04 | −0.06 | −0.32 | 1.00 | 64.2 (4.4) | 25.2 (0.8) |
| | 2 | 1.57 | 0.00 | −0.44 | 1.54 | 65.5 (4.8) | 24.9 (2.5) |
| | 3 | 2.16 | −0.48 | −0.54 | 2.17 | 62.3 (4.7) | 24.8 (2.7) |
| | 4 | 2.59 | −0.40 | −0.57 | 2.70 | 61.6 (4.3) | 21.7 (2.1) |
| AU | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 239.9 (43.1) | 3.9 (0.5) |
| | 1 | 2.39 | −2.17 | 0.67 | 2.78 | 255.5 (38.1) | 3.7 (0.5) |
| | 2 | 3.08 | −2.82 | 1.05 | 3.43 | 262.8 (47.3) | 3.8 (0.5) |
| | 3 | 3.03 | −1.63 | 1.39 | 4.22 | 250.0 (40.3) | 3.9 (0.6) |
| | 4 | 3.95 | −2.64 | 1.76 | 5.29 | 248.8 (28.9) | 3.5 (0.5) |
| CU | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 117.1 (9.2) | 9.1 (0.8) |
| | 1 | 0.62 | −0.15 | −0.10 | 0.61 | 101.9 (15.7) | 8.2 (1.0) |
| | 2 | 1.20 | 0.06 | −0.06 | 1.26 | 107.2 (11.6) | 8.2 (0.7) |
| | 3 | 1.52 | −0.84 | −0.07 | 1.48 | 107.1 (8.3) | 8.6 (0.5) |
| | 4 | 1.82 | −0.28 | −0.06 | 1.92 | 108.2 (11.0) | 8.1 (0.5) |
| Wp1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ND | ND |
| | 1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| | 2 | 2.74 | −0.50 | −0.39 | 2.73 | ND | ND |
| | 3 | 3.64 | 0.42 | −0.46 | 3.70 | ND | ND |
| | 4 | 5.70 | 3.33 | −0.62 | 5.21 | ND | ND |
| Sp1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 62.9 (4.9) | 25.0 (2.6) |
| | 1 | 1.07 | −0.61 | −0.17 | 1.13 | 55.6 (6.1) | 19.7 (1.4) |
| | 2 | 1.78 | −0.31 | −0.30 | 1.98 | 46.0 (3.7) | 14.5 (0.7) |
| | 3 | 2.15 | 0.25 | −0.41 | 2.37 | 34.2 (9.4) | 13.2 (1.5) |
| | 4 | 3.27 | 2.02 | −0.39 | 3.24 | 33.2 (6.1) | 10.1 (1.8) |
| Ac1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 105.9 (18.3) | 2.1 (0.3) |
| | 1 | 3.04 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 3.17 | 14.6 (4.9) | 1.8 (0.4) |
| | 2 | 4.54 | −0.37 | 0.63 | 4.64 | 6.5 (1.9) | 1.0 (0.3) |
| | 3 | 5.33 | −0.68 | 1.20 | 5.34 | NDc | NDc |
| | 4 | 4.96 | −2.00 | 1.08 | 4.75 | NDc | NDc |
| Cc1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 68.3 (5.3) | 6.9 (0.7) |
| | 1 | 7.35 | −4.23 | 0.30 | 6.92 | 29.5 (3.9) | 4.9 (0.6) |
| | 2 | 10.49 | −4.68 | 1.29 | 10.55 | 13.0 (0.4) | 3.7 (0.6) |
| | 3 | 12.15 | −5.71 | 2.29 | 12.24 | 7.7 (1.1) | 3.5 (0.2) |
| 4 | 13.24 | −6.72 | 3.02 | 13.22 | 6.2 (0.7) | 3.5 (0.2) | |
a. Not done.
b. Standard deviations of mean data are in parentheses.
c. Not done because the samples were too brittle to be prepared for analysis.
Figure 8The effect of accelerated ageing on the colour difference (ΔE*) of substitute textiles.
Figure 9Visible reflectance spectra of cellulosic substitute textiles after 0 and 4 weeks of accelerated ageing (80°C, 58% RH) and of cellulosic museum objects.