Literature DB >> 22616708

Cartilage restoration in haemophilia: advanced therapies.

A Liras1, A S Gaban, E C Rodriguez-Merchan.   

Abstract

Current treatment of joint cartilage lesions is based either on conventional techniques (bone marrow stimulation, osteochondral autograft or allograft transplantation) or on newly developed techniques (chondrocyte implantation and those based on cell therapy that use bioreactors, growth factors, mesenchymal stem cells [MSCs] and genetically modified cells). The aim of this article is to review the therapeutic strategies above mentioned and to determine whether the chondral damage seen in haemophilia could benefit from any of them. The different conventional techniques have shown similar results whereas autologous chondrocyte implantation, which is in common use at the present time, has not been shown to produce any conclusive results or to lead to the formation of hyaline cartilage. MSCs hold promise for the repair of joint cartilage given their differentiation capacity and the therapeutic effect. The use of bioreactors and growth factors, which stimulate cartilage formation, may optimize such strategies in the context of reimplantation of chondrocytes, differentiated MSCs and cartilage progenitor cells. The aim of cell therapy is restoration of function through the repair of damaged tissue or the stimulation of growth factor synthesis. Implantation of autologous chondrocytes or MSCs was up to now able to address only highly localized chondral lesions. Adequate control of the differentiation process as well as the use of growth factors and appropriate bioreactors could transform cell-based therapies into a more efficient and longer term treatment even for patients with haemophilia. Nevertheless, raising false expectations in these patients should be avoided. There are a number of approaches to cartilage restoration in haemophilic arthropathy, which are currently being explored for other joint related degenerative disorders. If it can be proven to be effective for the disorders in which clinical trials are ongoing and costs could be limited, it might be an useful palliative approach to haemophilic arthropathy. However, we still have a long way to go for use in haemophilic arthropathy.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22616708     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02816.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  5 in total

1.  Osteochondral repair in hemophilic ankle arthropathy: from current options to future perspectives.

Authors:  Roberto Buda; Marco Cavallo; Francesco Castagnini; Enrico Ferranti; Simone Natali; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-01-31

2.  Declining trends in invasive orthopedic interventions for people with hemophilia enrolled in the Universal Data Collection program (2000-2010).

Authors:  P Tobase; H Lane; A-E-A Siddiqi; R Ingram-Rich; R S Ward
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 3.  Advanced therapies for the treatment of hemophilia: future perspectives.

Authors:  Antonio Liras; Cristina Segovia; Aline S Gabán
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  Treatment of Hemophilic Ankle Arthropathy with One-Step Arthroscopic Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Transplantation.

Authors:  Roberto Buda; Marco Cavallo; Francesco Castagnini; Annarita Cenacchi; Simone Natali; Francesca Vannini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Preliminary study on non-viral transfection of F9 (factor IX) gene by nucleofection in human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Susana Olmedillas López; Mariano Garcia-Arranz; Damian Garcia-Olmo; Antonio Liras
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.