Literature DB >> 22616433

Brucellae through the food chain: the role of sheep, goats and springbok (Antidorcus marsupialis) as sources of human infections in Namibia.

K Magwedere1, A Bishi, G Tjipura-Zaire, G Eberle, Y Hemberger, L C Hoffman, F Dziva.   

Abstract

A confirmed case of human brucellosis motivated an investigation into the potential source of infection in Namibia. Since domestic animals are principal sources of Brucella infection in humans, 1692 serum samples were screened from sheep, goats and cattle from 4 presumably at-risk farms and 900 springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) serum samples from 29 mixed farming units for Brucella antibodies by the Rose-Bengal test (RBT) and positive cases confirmed by complement fixation test (CFT). To assess the prevalence of human brucellosis, 137 abattoir employees were tested for Brucella antibodies using the standard tube agglutination test (STAT) and by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cattle and sheep from all 4 farms were negative by RBT and CFT but 2 of the 4 farms (Ba and C) had 26/42 and 12/285 seropositive goats, respectively. Post mortem examination of seropositive goats revealed no gross pathological lesions typical of brucellosis except enlarged mesenteric and iliac lymph nodes seen in a single buck. Culture for brucellae from organs of seropositive animals was negative. None of the wildlife sera tested positive by either RBT or CFT. Interviews revealed that besides the case that prompted the investigation, a family and another person from other farms with confirmed brucellosis shared a common history of consumption of unpasteurised goat milk, home-made goat cheese and coffee with raw milk and prior contact with goats, suggesting goats as the likely source of infection. All 137 abattoir employees tested negative by STAT, but 3 were positive by ELISA. The 3 abattoir workers were clinically normal and lacked historical connections with clinical cases. Although goats are often associated with B. melitensis, these studies could not explicitly implicate this species owing to cross-reactivity with B. abortus, which can also infect goats. Nevertheless, these data reinforce the need for a better National Control Programme for brucellosis in Namibia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22616433     DOI: 10.4102/jsava.v82i4.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc        ISSN: 1019-9128            Impact factor:   1.474


  5 in total

1.  Serological prevalence and public health significance of brucellosis on a dairy farm in Namibia from 2011 to 2014.

Authors:  Oscar Madzingira; Precious Mupoti Sezuni
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-11-25

Review 2.  Caprine brucellosis: A historically neglected disease with significant impact on public health.

Authors:  Carlos A Rossetti; Angela M Arenas-Gamboa; Estefanía Maurizio
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-08-17

3.  Zoonoses: a potential obstacle to the growing wildlife industry of Namibia.

Authors:  Kudakwashe Magwedere; Maria Y Hemberger; Louw C Hoffman; Francis Dziva
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-15

4.  Brucellosis in wildlife in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Simpson; Peter N Thompson; Claude Saegerman; Tanguy Marcotty; Jean-Jacques Letesson; Xavier de Bolle; Jacques Godfroid
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Progressive Area Elimination of Bovine Brucellosis, 2013-2018, in Gauteng Province, South Africa: Evaluation Using Laboratory Test Reports.

Authors:  Krpasha Govindasamy; Eric M C Etter; Peter Geertsma; Peter N Thompson
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-12-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.