| Literature DB >> 22615616 |
A Rezaei Mokarram1, A Kebriaee Zadeh, M Keshavarz, A Ahmadi, B Mohtat.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: During the last two decades one of the most important problems in drug formulations has been low aqueous solubility of new molecules. However, numerous techniques, such as milling, co-solvent solubilization and solid dispersion have been used conventionally for aqueous solubility enhancement and the rate of solubility. Recently, nanoparticle engineering processes have been developed and reported for pharmaceutical applications to increase the dissolution rate of low-soluble drugs which in turn may leads to substantial increases in bioavailability. In this study, a controlled precipitation method was used to produce indomethacin nano-solid suspension in a polymeric matrix (as a model), in order to increase the solubility and rate of the dissolution of poorly soluble model drug.Entities:
Keywords: Controlled precipitation; Indomethacin; Nano-solid suspension; Polyvinyl pyrrolidone
Year: 2010 PMID: 22615616 PMCID: PMC3304364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Daru ISSN: 1560-8115 Impact factor: 3.117
Figure 1FT-IR pattern of A) IND (polymorph I), B) IND (polymorph II), C) IND:PVP (1:2) physical mixture, D) IND:PVP (1:2) nano-solid suspension and E) pure PVP.
Figure 2Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of IND:PVP nanosuspensions samples: A) IND (polymorph I), B) IND (polymorph II), C) IND:PVP (2:1) physical mixture, D) IND:PVP (2:1) nanosuspension and E) PVP
Effect of polymer MW and drug ratio on the particle size and polydispersity index of selected nano-solid suspension formulation.
| Type system | Intrinsic solubility* | Relative solubility** |
|---|---|---|
| Nano-solid suspension | 5.86±1.2 | 6.45 |
| Physical mixture | 2.30±0.51 | 2.53 |
| Polymorph I | 0.91±0.26 | 1.00 |
| Polymorph II | 1.44±0.34 | 1.59 |
PI= polydispersity index
(n = 3)
Figure 3TEM micrograph of indomethacin nanoparticles released from freeze-dried nano-solid suspension (9:1) drug:polymer ratio. Ten µl of medium was taken immediately after dissolving the freeze-dried sample in ultrapure water.
Figure 4Differential scanning calorimeter thermograms of indomethacin (form I& II), PVP and nano-solid suspension (1:2).
Figure 5Dissolution profile of pure indomethacin (form I&II), physical mixtures and nano-solid dispersions, drug:polymer ratio (2:1).
Comparison of intrinsic and relative solubility of indomethacin in different state.
| Type system | Intrinsic solubility | Relative solubility |
|---|---|---|
| Nano-solid suspension | 5.86±1.2 | 6.45 |
| Physical mixture | 2.30±0.51 | 2.53 |
| Polymorph I | 0.91±0.26 | 1.00 |
| Polymorph II | 1.44±0.34 | 1.59 |
mg/100 ml of medium (n = 3)
relative to polymorph I