Literature DB >> 22615345

Trends in patients hospitalized with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence, therapies, and outcomes.

Benjamin A Steinberg1, Xin Zhao, Paul A Heidenreich, Eric D Peterson, Deepak L Bhatt, Christopher P Cannon, Adrian F Hernandez, Gregg C Fonarow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (EF) is a common syndrome, but trends in treatments and outcomes are lacking. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 275 hospitals in Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure from January 2005 to October 2010. Patients were stratified by EF as reduced EF (EF <40% [HF-reduced EF]), borderline EF (40%≤EF<50% [HF-borderline EF]), or preserved (EF ≥50% [HF-preserved EF]). Using multivariable models, we examined trends in therapies and outcomes. Among 110 621 patients, 50% (55 083) had HF-reduced EF, 14% (15 184) had HF-borderline EF, and 36% (40 354) had HF-preserved EF. From 2005 to 2010, the proportion of hospitalizations for HF-preserved EF increased from 33% to 39% (P<0.0001). In multivariable analyses, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers at discharge decreased in all EF groups, and β-blocker use increased. Patients with HF-preserved EF less frequently achieved blood pressure control (adjusted odds ratio, 0.44 versus HF-reduced EF; P<0.001) and were more likely discharged to skilled nursing (adjusted odds ratio, 1.16 versus HF-reduced EF; P<0.001). In-hospital mortality for HF-preserved EF decreased from 3.32% in 2005 to 2.35% in 2010 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89 per year; P=0.01) but was stable for patients with HF-reduced EF (3.03%-2.83%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.93 per year; P=0.10).
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization for HF-preserved EF is increasing relative to HF-reduced EF. Although in-hospital mortality for patients with HF-preserved EF declined over the study period, an important opportunity remains for identifying evidence-based therapies in patients with HF-preserved EF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22615345     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.080770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  223 in total

1.  Comparison of medication practices in patients with heart failure and preserved versus those with reduced ejection fraction (from the Cardiovascular Research Network [CVRN]).

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Jerry H Gurwitz; Jane S Saczynski; Grace Hsu; David D McManus; David J Magid; David H Smith; Alan S Go
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Retraction. rhBNP therapy can improve clinical outcomes and reduce in-hospital mortality compared with dobutamine in heart failure patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Yi Lv; Shu-Ling Deng; Xiao-Feng Long
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Heart failure with preserved vs reduced ejection fraction following cardiac rehabilitation: impact of endothelial function.

Authors:  Seiya Tanaka; Yoshihito Sanuki; Kiyoshi Ozumi; Takashi Harada; Hiromi Tasaki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Addressing the Heterogeneity of Heart Failure in Future Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Annamaria Iorio; Andrea Pozzi; Michele Senni
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-06

5.  Low level exercise echocardiography helps diagnose early stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a study of echocardiography versus catheterization.

Authors:  Nadjib Hammoudi; Florent Laveau; Gérard Helft; Nathalie Cozic; Olivier Barthelemy; Alexandre Ceccaldi; Thibaut Petroni; Emmanuel Berman; Michel Komajda; Pierre-Louis Michel; Alain Mallet; Claude Le Feuvre; Richard Isnard
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Discharge Processes and 30-Day Readmission Rates of Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure on General Medicine and Cardiology Services.

Authors:  Brian M Salata; Madeline R Sterling; Ashley N Beecy; Ajayram V Ullal; Erica C Jones; Evelyn M Horn; Parag Goyal
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  US National Trends in Mortality From Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: Policy Success or Failure?

Authors:  Paula Chatterjee; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  Risk factors for rehospitalization in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Masahiko Setoguchi; Yuji Hashimoto; Taro Sasaoka; Takashi Ashikaga; Mitsuaki Isobe
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 9.  Cardiac Rehabilitation in Older Adults with Heart Failure: Fitting a Square Peg in a Round Hole.

Authors:  Kelsey M Flint; Amy M Pastva; Gordon R Reeves
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.076

10.  Long-term survival for patients with acute decompensated heart failure according to ejection fraction findings.

Authors:  Andrew H Coles; Kimberly Fisher; Chad Darling; Jorge Yarzebski; David D McManus; Joel M Gore; Darleen Lessard; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.