Literature DB >> 22615224

Formulation of multiple choice questions as a revision exercise at the end of a teaching module in biochemistry.

Zachariah Bobby1, M R Radhika, H Nandeesha, A Balasubramanian, Singh Prerna, Nimesh Archana, D N Thippeswamy.   

Abstract

The graduate medical students often get less opportunity for clarifying their doubts and to reinforce their concepts after lecture classes. Assessment of the effect of MCQ preparation by graduate medical students as a revision exercise on the topic "Mineral metabolism." At the end of regular teaching module on the topic "Mineral metabolism," graduate medical students were asked to prepare the stems of 15 MCQs based on the four discriminators given for each. They were told that one of the discriminators could be the answer for the MCQ and the remaining three could be the distracters. They were further guided in their task by providing few key word(s) in the stem of the expected MCQ. In the first phase of the exercise, the students attempted the MCQ preparation individually without peer consultation. In the second phase, the students participated in small group discussion to formulate the best MCQs of the group. The effects on low, medium, and high achievers were evaluated by pre and post-tests with the same set of MCQs. Both the individual endeavor in Phase 1 and small group discussion in Phase 2 for the formulation of MCQs significantly contributed to the gain from the exercise. The gains from the individual task and from small group discussion were equal among the different categories of students. Both phases of the exercise were equally beneficial for the low, medium, and high achievers. The high and medium achievers retained the gain from the exercise even after 1 week of the exercise whereas the low achievers could not retain the gain completely. Formulation of MCQs is an effective and useful unconventional revision exercise in Biochemistry for graduate medical students.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22615224     DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1470-8175            Impact factor:   1.160


  2 in total

1.  Does developing multiple-choice Questions Improve Medical Students' Learning? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Youness Touissi; Ghita Hjiej; Abderrazak Hajjioui; Azeddine Ibrahimi; Maryam Fourtassi
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

2.  Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.

Authors:  Jason L Walsh; Benjamin H L Harris; Paul Denny; Phil Smith
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.401

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.