Literature DB >> 22614225

Marksmanship deficits caused by an exhaustive whole-body lifting task with and without torso-borne loads.

Peter N Frykman1, Donna J Merullo, Louis E Banderet, Karen Gregorczyk, Leif Hasselquist.   

Abstract

Studies of exhaustive exercise on marksmanship are inconclusive and have not measured trigger pull latencies (LAT) nor considered impact of added torso loads. This study examined the impact of exhaustive whole-body exercise and torso loading on accuracy, precision, and latency during a marksmanship test. Twelve men lifted a 20.5-kg box on to a 1.55-m high shelf until they could not maintain a 12 lifts·min⁻¹ pace. Within 25 seconds of ending the lifting task, the subjects started a 10-minute rifle marksmanship test (8 shots·min⁻¹). During lifting and shooting, the subjects wore 2 different loads: NOLOAD = boots, uniform, and helmet (5.9 kg) and LOAD = a torso-borne load (29.9 kg) + NOLOAD. With the LOAD, the subjects were only able to work for 69% as long, perform 31% as many lifts, or do 38% as much total work compared with the NOLOAD condition. Despite performing less total external work during LOAD, the heart rate (HR) was more than 25% higher than NOLOAD. Measures of accuracy and precision improved and stabilized after minute 3. Overall, LAT increased (p < 0.025) for LOAD (mean ± SE, 2,522 ± 81 milliseconds), compared with NOLOAD (2,240 ± 121). During 0-4 minutes, LAT for LOAD was 14% greater than for NOLOAD (p < 0.05); from 4 to 10 minutes, LAT did not differ. Exhaustive whole-body exercise transiently degraded accuracy regardless of load. In the LOAD condition, LAT was immediately increased and sustained for 10 minutes; in the NOLOAD condition, LAT increased gradually. Although load did not decrease accuracy, it increased the time to engage targets, which can impact fighting effectiveness and survivability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22614225     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825cedfa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of Psychophysiological Response and Specific Fine Motor Skills in Combat Units.

Authors:  Joaquín Sánchez-Molina; José J Robles-Pérez; Vicente J Clemente-Suárez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Physical Stress and Determinants of Shooting Performance Among Norwegian Special Forces Operators.

Authors:  Jan Erik Buskerud; Frank Eirik Abrahamsen; Paul André Solberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Body-worn IMU array reveals effects of load on performance in an outdoor obstacle course.

Authors:  Rachel V Vitali; Stephen M Cain; Lauro V Ojeda; Michael V Potter; Antonia M Zaferiou; Steven P Davidson; Megan E Coyne; Clifford L Hancock; Alyssa Mendoza; Leia A Stirling; Noel C Perkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The impact of body armor on physical performance of law enforcement personnel: a systematic review.

Authors:  Colin Tomes; Robin Marc Orr; Rodney Pope
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-05-16

5.  Comparing the Effects of Different Body Armor Systems on the Occupational Performance of Police Officers.

Authors:  Ben Schram; Robin Orr; Rodney Pope; Ben Hinton; Geoff Norris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.