Literature DB >> 22613810

Which kind of transition is important for sound representation? An event-related potential study.

Annekathrin Weise1, Alexandra Bendixen, Dagmar Müller, Erich Schröger.   

Abstract

Auditory transients (such as sound onset or a frequency transition within a continuous sound) are assumed to parse the auditory input into smaller units enabling the formation of unitary sound representations separately for each segment. This was discovered by using the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the event-related potential (ERP) that taps into auditory sensory memory representations. For unstructured sounds, MMN amplitude decreased or even vanished with increasing the temporal distance of an irregular feature (deviance, e.g. duration decrement) relative to the onset of an otherwise regularly occurring sound, whereas for sounds that were segmented by a transient, MMN persisted. It has been speculated that the P1-N1-P2 complex, indexing the sensory encoding of the transient, determines the temporal units of the acoustic input that are represented by the information processing system. To test this hypothesis, we utilized a previously reported asymmetry in the sensory encoding of physically identical but time-reversed transitions between segments of constant and gliding frequency. In separate blocks, we regularly presented 1400-ms sounds with a centered constant-to-glide or glide-to-constant transition. Occasionally and unpredictably, one of the regularly occurring sounds was shortened in duration to 910 ms. We found larger transition-related P1-N1-P2 potentials accompanied by larger deviance-related MMN amplitudes for sounds with constant-to-glide transition than for sounds with glide-to-constant transition. This provides evidence that it is the precise sensory encoding of the transition which is crucial for automatically parsing the auditory input into smaller units, thus enabling the formation of unitary sound representations even for late segments.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22613810     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  8 in total

1.  EEG signatures accompanying auditory figure-ground segregation.

Authors:  Brigitta Tóth; Zsuzsanna Kocsis; Gábor P Háden; Ágnes Szerafin; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; István Winkler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of cognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  Risto Näätänen; Elyse S Sussman; Dean Salisbury; Valerie L Shafer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Temporal feature perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lydia Timm; Deepashri Agrawal; Filipa C Viola; Pascale Sandmann; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Auditory Event-Related Potentials Associated With Music Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Andréanne Sharp; Audrey Delcenserie; François Champoux
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Effects of Sound-Pressure Change on the 40 Hz Auditory Steady-State Response and Change-Related Cerebral Response.

Authors:  Eishi Motomura; Koji Inui; Yasuhiro Kawano; Makoto Nishihara; Motohiro Okada
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-08-16

6.  Temporo-cerebellar connectivity underlies timing constraints in audition.

Authors:  Anika Stockert; Michael Schwartze; David Poeppel; Alfred Anwander; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Modelling the emergence and dynamics of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming.

Authors:  Robert W Mill; Tamás M Bőhm; Alexandra Bendixen; István Winkler; Susan L Denham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Timing matters: the processing of pitch relations.

Authors:  Annekathrin Weise; Sabine Grimm; Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.