Literature DB >> 22613638

Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China.

Hui Li1, Bin Hu, Bin You, Jin-bai Miao, Yi-li Fu, Qi-rui Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was usually performed with either hand-sewn or circular stapler anastomosis through a small thoracotomy or using a side-to-side stapler anastomotic technique. This study aimed to present our initial results of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy using a circular-stapled anastomosis with transoral anvil technique.
METHODS: Six patients with esophageal cancer underwent minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with an intrathoracic circular-stapled end-to-end anastomosis. The abdominal portion was operated on laparoscopically, and the thoracic portion was done using thoracoscopic techniques. A 25 mm anvil connected to a 90 cm long delivery tube was introduced transorally to the esophageal stump in a tilted position, the anvil head was then connected to circular stapler. The anastomosis was completed under direct thoracoscopic view.
RESULTS: A total of six patients in this report successfully underwent total laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a circular-stapled anastomosis using a transoral anvil. They were five male and one female patients, and had a mean age of 55 years (range, 38-69 years). The thoracic and abdominal operations were successfully performed without any intraoperative complications or conversion to laparotomy or thoracotomy. The passage of the anvil head was technically easy and successful in all six cases. The mean overall operative time was (260 ± 42) minutes (range, 220-300 minutes), and the mean estimated blood loss was (520 ± 160) ml (range, 130-800 ml). Patients resumed a liquid oral diet on postoperative day seven. The median length of hospital stay was 17 days (range, 9-25 days). The postoperative pathological diagnosis was esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in five patients and esophageal small cell carcinoma in one patient. Tumors were staged as T(2)N(0)M(0) in three cases, T(2)N(1)M(0) in one case, and T(3)N(0)M(0) in two cases. During the mean follow-up of 2.5 months (range, 2-4 months), there were no intraoperative technical failure of the anastomosis or major postoperative complications such as leak or stricture.
CONCLUSIONS: The initial results of this small series suggest that minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for malignant esophageal tumor is technically feasible. However, further multi-center prospective studies and thorough evaluation are needed to evaluate the long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22613638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  9 in total

Review 1.  Chinese expert consensus on mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2017 edition).

Authors:  Hui Li; Wentao Fang; Zhentao Yu; Yousheng Mao; Longqi Chen; Jie He; Tiehua Rong; Chun Chen; Haiquan Chen; Keneng Chen; Ming Du; Yongtao Han; Jian Hu; Jianhua Fu; Xiaobin Hou; Taiqian Gong; Yin Li; Junfeng Liu; Shuoyan Liu; Lijie Tan; Hui Tian; Qun Wang; Jiaqing Xiang; Meiqing Xu; Xin Ye; Bin You; Renquan Zhang; Yan Zhao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Chunbo Zhai; Yongjing Liu; Wei Li; Tongzhen Xu; Guotao Yang; Hengxiao Lu; Dehong Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  A new technology for reducing anastomotic fistula in the neck after esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ya-Nan Song; Yu Qi; Chun-Yang Zhang; Yin-Liang Sheng; Kai Wu; Sen-Lin Zhu; Lu Han; Ting-Ting Shan; Guan-Chao Ye; Qing-Yi Zhang; Yan-Li Chen; Jin-Wei Chen; Ya-Fei Liu; Lu-Bing Gao; Yang Yang; Zhan-Feng He; Deng-Yan Zhu; Dong-Lei Liu; Feng-Biao Wen; Tian-Liang Zheng; Ji-Lun Li; Song Zhao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer according to the location of the tumor: Experience of 251 patients.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Xi Liu; Rong Wang; Yuncang Wang; Tao Zhang; Dewei Gao; Linggen Gao
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  Effectiveness of jejunostomy for enteral nutrition during complete thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in thoracic segment esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jieyong Tian; Xinyu Mei; Mingfa Guo; Ran Xiong; Xiangxiang Sun
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Comparison of Two Circular-Stapled Techniques for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Hang Lin; Ge'ao Liang; Huiping Chai; Yongde Liao; Chunfang Zhang; Yuanda Cheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the People's Republic of China: an overview.

Authors:  Chengchu Zhu; Ketao Jin
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Surgical Method, Postoperative Complications, and Gastrointestinal Motility of Thoraco-Laparoscopy 3-Field Esophagectomy in Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Jun Wan; Yun Che; Ningning Kang; Renquan Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-06-16

9.  Thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy combined with left inferior pulmonary ligament lymphadenectomy for esophageal carcinoma via the right thoracic approach: A single-center retrospective study of 30 cases.

Authors:  Shijie Huang; Tianbao Yang; Wu Wang; Guozhong Huang; Boyang Chen; Pengfei Chen; Douli Ke; Wenhua Huang; Jinbiao Xie
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.