Literature DB >> 2261341

Cancer patients' concerns: congruence between patients and primary care physicians.

R Goldberg1, E Guadagnoli, R A Silliman, A Glicksman.   

Abstract

To investigate whether physicians perceive concerns of cancer patients in the same way as patients, we asked primary care physicians and cancer patients to complete an instrument that allowed each to indicate their views of the relative importance of a variety of treatment and disease-related concerns. The instrument was completed by 195 physicians (56% response) and 119 newly diagnosed breast, lung, and colorectal cancer patients (50% response). Psychometric analysis of responses to the instrument revealed two components: general concerns and physician-treatment concerns. For both the physician and the patient groups, internal consistency (coefficient alpha) of these two components was high (greater than .83). Within the patient group, scale scores did not differ as a function of performance status, cancer type, extent of disease, or age. For physicians, scale scores were not related to years in practice, board certification, or number of new cancer patients seen per year. A comparison of scale scores between groups indicated that there was good physician-patient congruence on only one of the two concern components. Physicians do not adequately appreciate the extent of concern patients have with regard to treatment and physician interaction issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2261341     DOI: 10.1080/08858199009528064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  8 in total

1.  Information and support for women following the primary treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jane C A Raupach; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Patients' beliefs about cancer management.

Authors:  J Buchanan; R Borland; W Cosolo; R Millership; I Haines; A Zimet; J Zalcberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  A colorectal cancer patient focus group develops an information package.

Authors:  L Carney; L Jones; F Braddon; A M Pullyblank; A R Dixon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Prognostic disclosure in oncology - current communication models: a scoping review.

Authors:  Julie Rachel Bloom; Deborah Catherine Marshall; Carlos Rodriguez-Russo; Emily Martin; Joshua Adam Jones; Kavita Vyas Dharmarajan
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.633

5.  Patients' and professionals' evaluations of quality of care in oncology outpatient clinics.

Authors:  Danièle Roberge; Dominique Tremblay; Marie-Ève Turgeon; Djamal Berbiche
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Do physician communication skills influence screening mammography utilization?

Authors:  Ari-Nareg Meguerditchian; Dale Dauphinee; Nadyne Girard; Tewodros Eguale; Kristen Riedel; André Jacques; Sarkis Meterissian; David L Buckeridge; Michal Abrahamowicz; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Personal fear of death affects the proper process of breaking bad news.

Authors:  Aleksandra Ciałkowska-Rysz; Tomasz Dzierżanowski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Breaking bad news of cancer diagnosis - Perception of the cancer patients in a rural community in Malaysia.

Authors:  Mathew Gabriel Bain; Cheah Whye Lian; Chang Ching Thon
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2014-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.