Literature DB >> 22612930

A model of ruminal volatile fatty acid absorption kinetics and rumen epithelial blood flow in lactating Holstein cows.

A C Storm1, N B Kristensen, M D Hanigan.   

Abstract

Ruminal absorption of volatile fatty acids (VFA) is quantitatively the most important nutrient flux in cattle. Historically, VFA absorption models have been derived primarily from ruminal variables such as chemical composition of the fluid, volume, and pH. Recently, a mechanistic model incorporated the control of VFA absorption from epithelial surface area of the reticulorumen. In the present study, we hypothesized that ruminal absorption of VFA was controlled through epithelial permeability to VFA and rumen epithelial capillary blood flow. The objective of the study was to construct a model of VFA exchange across the rumen wall that incorporates epithelial blood flow as a driving force for ruminal VFA removal. The bidirectional fluxes between the ruminal and epithelial pool of VFA were assumed mass action driven, given that passive diffusion of nonionized VFA is the dominant transmembrane VFA flux. Parameter estimates were derived by fitting the model to observed data. The model provided reliable unbiased estimates of ruminal VFA absorption and rumen epithelial blood flow. Blood flow was modeled using an equation that considered the effect of butyrate and dietary crude protein intake per kilogram of body weight. The rate constants related to the flux from ruminal fluid to epithelium were in the order isobutyrate < acetate < propionate < butyrate (0.32 ± 0.02, 0.72 ± 0.2, 0.91 ± 0.06, and 0.97 ± 0.02 /h, respectively). The rate constants for fluxes of isobutyrate, acetate, propionate, and butyrate from the rumen epithelium to the ruminal fluid, relative to the pool size of the epithelium, were 4.78, 10.6, 13.4, and 14.3 /h, respectively. Ruminal concentrations of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and isobutyrate were predicted with root mean square prediction errors as percentage of the observed means (RMSPE) of 5.86, 5.75, 11.3, and 4.12, respectively. The epithelial blood flow was predicted with 26.3% RMSPE. Sensitivity analyses indicated that when ruminal butyrate concentration increased from 4.0 to 37.4 mmol/L, blood flow of the epithelium increased 47% and the ruminal disappearance rate of propionate increased 11%. The concentration gradient of propionate between ruminal fluid and epithelium was no more than 3:1 and increased with increasing blood flow. In conclusion, a dynamic model based on rumen epithelial blood flow and bidirectional fluxes of VFA between ruminal fluid and epithelium gave unbiased predictions with low residual error of ruminal VFA absorption under washed rumen conditions. The model indicates that the effect of varying epithelial blood flow on the control of ruminal VFA absorption is related to the concentration gradient of individual VFA between ruminal fluid and epithelial blood. Epithelial blood flow may be an important determinant of ruminal absorption of VFA, a result that has not been evaluated on independent data.
Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22612930     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  11 in total

1.  Effect of ruminal acidosis and short-term low feed intake on indicators of gastrointestinal barrier function in Holstein steers.

Authors:  Rae-Leigh A Pederzolli; Andrew G Van Kessel; John Campbell; Steve Hendrick; Katie M Wood; Gregory B Penner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Feeding a High Concentrate Diet Down-Regulates Expression of ACACA, LPL and SCD and Modifies Milk Composition in Lactating Goats.

Authors:  Hui Tao; Guangjun Chang; Tianle Xu; Huajian Zhao; Kai Zhang; Xiangzhen Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Body fat mobilization in early lactation influences methane production of dairy cows.

Authors:  A Bielak; M Derno; A Tuchscherer; H M Hammon; A Susenbeth; B Kuhla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Inhibition of Rumen Methanogenesis and Ruminant Productivity: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emilio M Ungerfeld
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-19

5.  Metabolic Hydrogen Flows in Rumen Fermentation: Principles and Possibilities of Interventions.

Authors:  Emilio M Ungerfeld
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Synchronization of rumen degradable protein with non-fiber carbohydrate on microbial protein synthesis and dairy ration digestibility.

Authors:  Annisa Rosmalia; Idat Galih Permana; Despal Despal
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-02-05

7.  The requirements for rumen-degradable protein per unit of fermentable organic matter differ between fibrous feed sources.

Authors:  Carla R Soliva; Sergej L Amelchanka; Michael Kreuzer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  The Contribution of Mathematical Modeling to Understanding Dynamic Aspects of Rumen Metabolism.

Authors:  André Bannink; Henk J van Lingen; Jennifer L Ellis; James France; Jan Dijkstra
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Effects of grain processing methods on the expression of genes involved in volatile fatty acid transport and pH regulation, and keratinization in rumen epithelium of beef cattle.

Authors:  Pedro Del Bianco Benedeti; Breno de Castro Silva; Marcos Vinícius Carneiro Pacheco; Nicola Vergara Lopes Serão; Ivan Carvalho Filho; Mariana Mescouto Lopes; Marcos Inácio Marcondes; Hilário Cuquetto Mantovani; Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho; Edenio Detmann; Marcio de Souza Duarte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ruminal volatile fatty acid absorption is affected by elevated ambient temperature.

Authors:  Andrea Bedford; Linda Beckett; Laura Harthan; Chong Wang; Ning Jiang; Hollie Schramm; Le Luo Guan; Kristy M Daniels; Mark D Hanigan; Robin R White
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.