Literature DB >> 22612767

How decisions emerge: action dynamics in intertemporal decision making.

Maja Dshemuchadse1, Stefan Scherbaum, Thomas Goschke.   

Abstract

In intertemporal decision making, individuals prefer smaller rewards delivered sooner over larger rewards delivered later, often to an extent that seems irrational from an economical perspective. This behavior has been attributed to a lack of self-control and reflection, the nonlinearity of human time perception, and several other sources. Although an increasing number of models propose different mathematical descriptions of temporal discounting, the dynamics of the decision process behind temporal discounting are much less clear. In this study, we obtained further insights into the mechanisms of intertemporal decisions by observing choice action dynamics via a novel combination of continuously recorded mouse movements and a multiple regression approach. Participants had to choose between two hypothetical options (sooner/smaller vs. later/larger) by moving the mouse cursor from the bottom of the screen either to the top left or to the top right. We observed less direct mouse movements when participants chose later/larger rewards, indicating that participants had to overcome the attraction of the sooner/smaller reward first. Additionally, our results suggest that framing time information differently changes the weighting of value. We conclude that using a continuous process-oriented approach could further advance the understanding of intertemporal choice beyond the identification of the best fitted mathematical description of the discounting function by uncovering the way intertemporal decisions are performed. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22612767     DOI: 10.1037/a0028499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  31 in total

1.  Analysis of hand kinematics reveals inter-individual differences in intertemporal decision dynamics.

Authors:  Cinzia Calluso; Giorgia Committeri; Giovanni Pezzulo; Nathan Lepora; Annalisa Tosoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Using dynamic monitoring of choices to predict and understand risk preferences.

Authors:  Paul E Stillman; Ian Krajbich; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Psychometrics of the continuous mind: Measuring cognitive sub-processes via mouse tracking.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Maja Dshemuchadse
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

4.  Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.

Authors:  Jonas Lins; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Dietary self-control is related to the speed with which attributes of healthfulness and tastiness are processed.

Authors:  Nicolette Sullivan; Cendri Hutcherson; Alison Harris; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12-16

7.  Path Tortuosity in Virtual Reality: A Novel Approach for Quantifying Behavioral Process in a Food Choice Context.

Authors:  Haley E Yaremych; William D Kistler; Niraj Trivedi; Susan Persky
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2019-06-26

Review 8.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

9.  Evaluating effects of episodic future thinking on valuation of delayed reward in cocaine use disorder: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Stuart R Steinhauer; Andrea Ortiz; Steven D Forman
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 10.  Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science.

Authors:  Martin Schoemann; Denis O'Hora; Rick Dale; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.