Literature DB >> 22612646

Optimizing the use of the AUDIT for alcohol screening in college students.

Kelly S Demartini1, Kate B Carey.   

Abstract

The screening and brief intervention modality of treatment for at-risk college drinking is becoming increasingly popular. A key to effective implementation is use of validated screening tools. Although the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) has been validated in adult samples and is often used with college students, research has not yet established optimal cutoff scores to screen for at-risk drinking. Four hundred and one current drinkers completed computerized assessments of demographics, family history of alcohol use disorders, alcohol use history, alcohol-related problems, and general health. Of the 401 drinkers, 207 met criteria for at-risk drinking. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the area under the ROC (AUROC) of the AUDIT was .86 (95% CI [.83, .90]). The first 3 consumption items of the AUDIT (AUDIT-C; AUROC = .89, 95% CI [.86, .92]) performed significantly better than the AUDIT in the detection of at-risk drinking in the whole sample, and specifically for females. Gender differences emerged in the optimal cutoff scores for the AUDIT-C. A total score of 7 should be used for males, and a score of 5 should be used for females. These empirical guidelines may enhance identification of at-risk drinkers in college settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22612646      PMCID: PMC3869562          DOI: 10.1037/a0028519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  28 in total

1.  Positive and negative consequences of alcohol consumption in college students.

Authors:  Crystal L Park
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Talk is cheap: measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials.

Authors:  T F Babor; K Steinberg; R Anton; F Del Boca
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2000-01

3.  Screening for alcohol use disorders and at-risk drinking in the general population: psychometric performance of three questionnaires.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Rumpf; Ulfert Hapke; Christian Meyer; Ulrich John
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.826

4.  Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts. Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study surveys: 1993-2001.

Authors:  Henry Wechsler; Jae Eun Lee; Meichun Kuo; Mark Seibring; Toben F Nelson; Hang Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2002-03

5.  Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history.

Authors:  J S Baer; D R Kivlahan; A W Blume; P McKnight; G A Marlatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Gender differences in collegiate risk factors for heavy episodic drinking.

Authors:  Sean Esteban McCabe
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2002-01

Review 7.  Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among American college students.

Authors:  Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl       Date:  2002-03

8.  Correlates of AUDIT risk status for male and female college students.

Authors:  Kelly S Demartini; Kate B Carey
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

Review 9.  Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005.

Authors:  Ralph W Hingson; Wenxing Zha; Elissa R Weitzman
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl       Date:  2009-07

10.  Are retrospectively reconstructed blood alcohol concentrations accurate? Preliminary results from a field study.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; John T P Hustad
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2002-11
View more
  67 in total

1.  How Mandated College Students Talk About Alcohol: Peer Communication Factors Associated with Drinking.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Sarah A Lust; Allecia E Reid; Seth C Kalichman; Michael P Carey
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-02-09

2.  A randomized control trial of a deviance regulation theory intervention to increase alcohol protective strategies.

Authors:  Robert D Dvorak; Wendy Troop-Gordon; Brittany L Stevenson; Matthew P Kramer; Dexter Wilborn; Angelina V Leary
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-12

3.  A behavioral activation intervention administered in a 16-week freshman orientation course: Study protocol.

Authors:  Tera L Fazzino; Carl W Lejuez; Richard Yi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Self-regulation and alcohol use involvement: a latent class analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kuvaas; Robert D Dvorak; Matthew R Pearson; Dorian A Lamis; Emily M Sargent
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  A Prospective Study of Alcohol Use Patterns and Short-Term Weight Change in College Freshmen.

Authors:  Tera L Fazzino; Kelsie Forbush; Debra Sullivan; Christie A Befort
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Profiles of College Drinkers Defined by Alcohol Behaviors at the Week Level: Replication Across Semesters and Prospective Associations With Hazardous Drinking and Dependence-Related Symptoms.

Authors:  Anne M Fairlie; Jennifer L Maggs; Stephanie T Lanza
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  Reciprocal variations in sleep and drinking over time among heavy-drinking young adults.

Authors:  Lisa M Fucito; Krysten W Bold; Eliza Van Reen; Nancy S Redeker; Stephanie S O'Malley; Tess H Hanrahan; Kelly S DeMartini
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2017-11-27

8.  Efficacy of the College Drinkers Check-Up for Student Drinkers Living Off Campus.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Sara G Balestrieri; Mary Beth Miller; Jennifer E Merrill; Angelo M DiBello; Madeline B Benz
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Ecological momentary assessment of acute alcohol use disorder symptoms: associations with mood, motives, and use on planned drinking days.

Authors:  Robert D Dvorak; Matthew R Pearson; Anne M Day
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Do my peers approve? Interest in injunctive norms feedback delivered online to college student drinkers.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Mary Beth Miller; Sara G Balestrieri; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.