Literature DB >> 22612585

γ-Aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine.

E Barrett1, R P Ross, P W O'Toole, G F Fitzgerald, C Stanton.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the ability of human intestinally derived strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium to produce γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium were grown in medium containing monosodium glutamate (MSG). Growth of the bacteria and conversion of MSG to GABA were measured. Of 91 intestinally derived bacteria assessed, one Lactobacillus strain and four strains of Bifidobacterium produced GABA. Lactobacillus brevis DPC6108 was the most efficient of the strains tested, converting up to 90% [corrected] of MSG to GABA. The ability of the cultured intestinal strains to produce GABA was investigated using a simple pH-controlled anaerobic faeces-based fermentation, supplemented with 30 mg ml⁻¹ MSG. The addition of Lact. brevis DPC6108 to a faeces-based fermentation significantly increased the GABA concentration (P < 0·001), supporting the notion that this biosynthesis could occur in vivo.
CONCLUSIONS: The production of GABA by bifidobacteria exhibited considerable interspecies variation. Lactobacillus brevis and Bifidobacterium dentium were the most efficient GABA producers among the range of strains tested. The addition of Lact. brevis DPC6108 to the culturable gut microbiota increased the GABA concentration in fermented faecal slurry at physiological pH. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Identification of optimal MSG conversion to GABA by particular cultured elements of the commensal intestinal microbiota and the demonstration that this can occur under simulated in vivo conditions offer new prospects for microbiota modulation to promote health.
© 2012 Teagasc-The Agriculture and Food Development Authority Journal of Applied Microbiology © 2012 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22612585     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05344.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  282 in total

1.  Microbiota and host determinants of behavioural phenotype in maternally separated mice.

Authors:  G De Palma; P Blennerhassett; J Lu; Y Deng; A J Park; W Green; E Denou; M A Silva; A Santacruz; Y Sanz; M G Surette; E F Verdu; S M Collins; P Bercik
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Gut microbiome populations are associated with structure-specific changes in white matter architecture.

Authors:  Irene M Ong; Jose G Gonzalez; Sean J McIlwain; Emily A Sawin; Andrew J Schoen; Nagesh Adluru; Andrew L Alexander; John-Paul J Yu
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 3.  The Enteric Network: Interactions between the Immune and Nervous Systems of the Gut.

Authors:  Bryan B Yoo; Sarkis K Mazmanian
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 31.745

4.  γ-Aminobutyric acid-modified graphene oxide as a highly selective and low-toxic fluorescent nanoprobe for relay recognition of copper(II) and cysteine.

Authors:  Xiaotong Li; Kaimei Fan; Wukui Kang; Ruimei Yang; Baohan Qu; Lihua Lu
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 5.  The microbiome: stress, health and disease.

Authors:  Rachel D Moloney; Lieve Desbonnet; Gerard Clarke; Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  Manganese-induced sex-specific gut microbiome perturbations in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Liang Chi; Bei Gao; Xiaoming Bian; Pengcheng Tu; Hongyu Ru; Kun Lu
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 7.  Back to the Basics: Cnidarians Start to Fire.

Authors:  Thomas C G Bosch; Alexander Klimovich; Tomislav Domazet-Lošo; Stefan Gründer; Thomas W Holstein; Gáspár Jékely; David J Miller; Andrea P Murillo-Rincon; Fabian Rentzsch; Gemma S Richards; Katja Schröder; Ulrich Technau; Rafael Yuste
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 8.  The crosstalk of gut microbiota and chronic kidney disease: role of inflammation, proteinuria, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mehmet Kanbay; Emine M Onal; Baris Afsar; Tuncay Dagel; Aslihan Yerlikaya; Adrian Covic; Nosratola D Vaziri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Effect of gut microbes on olfactory behavior of Drosophila melanogaster larva.

Authors:  Eryn Slankster; Cammie Lee; Kristen M Hess; Seth Odell; Dennis Mathew
Journal:  Bios       Date:  2019-12-09

Review 10.  Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota.

Authors:  Philip Strandwitz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.