Literature DB >> 22611867

The width of riparian habitats for understory birds in an Amazonian forest.

Anderson Saldanha Bueno1, Renato Saragoça Bruno, Tania Pena Pimentel, Tânia Margarete Sanaiotti, William Ernest Magnusson.   

Abstract

Riparian habitats are important for the maintenance of regional biodiversity. Many studies have compared bird distributions between riparian and non-riparian habitats but have not established how wide riparian habitats used by birds are, as measured by distance from the nearest stream. We investigated the distribution of understory birds along gradients of distance from streams, soil clay content, and slope in a central Amazonian forest, by mist-netting birds three times in 45 plots. We used nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) to reduce the dimensionality of species quantitative (abundance) and qualitative (presence-absence) composition to one multivariate axis. Estimates of the width of riparian habitats as indicated by understory birds depended on the community attribute considered, measuring 90 m for species quantitative composition and 140 m for species qualitative composition. Species distributions were correlated with clay content but were independent of slope, while distance from streams was positively correlated with clay content but independent of slope. Clay content affects plant species composition, which in turn, may influence bird species composition. However, distribution patterns of birds in relation to distance from streams are consistent among studies carried out in many different temperate and tropical regions, indicating an effect of distance from streams itself. Protection of riparian habitats is one of the most widely used conservation strategies, and Brazilian environmental legislation mandates the protection of a 30 m wide strip of riparian vegetation on either side of small streams. We show that the protected strip should be much wider and recommend strategies to place other forms of land protection contiguous with riparian areas so that Brazilian environmental legislation better fulfills its role of protecting biodiversity associated with riparian habitats.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22611867     DOI: 10.1890/11-0789.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  9 in total

1.  Idiosyncratic responses of Amazonian birds to primary forest disturbance.

Authors:  Nárgila G Moura; Alexander C Lees; Alexandre Aleixo; Jos Barlow; Erika Berenguer; Joice Ferreira; Ralph Mac Nally; James R Thomson; Toby A Gardner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The costs of evaluating species densities and composition of snakes to assess development impacts in amazonia.

Authors:  Rafael de Fraga; Adam J Stow; William E Magnusson; Albertina P Lima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Step selection techniques uncover the environmental predictors of space use patterns in flocks of Amazonian birds.

Authors:  Jonathan R Potts; Karl Mokross; Philip C Stouffer; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  A new species of Amazonian snouted treefrog (Hylidae: Scinax) with description of a novel species-habitat association for an aquatic breeding frog.

Authors:  Miquéias Ferrão; Rafael de Fraga; Jiří Moravec; Igor L Kaefer; Albertina P Lima
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Environmental characteristics drive variation in Amazonian understorey bird assemblages.

Authors:  Juliana Menger; William E Magnusson; Marti J Anderson; Martin Schlegel; Guy Pe'er; Klaus Henle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Soil and forest structure predicts large-scale patterns of occurrence and local abundance of a widespread Amazonian frog.

Authors:  Robert Jehle; Adam J Stow; Albertina P Lima; Anthony S Ferreira
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Functional Redundancy in bird community decreases with riparian forest width reduction.

Authors:  Lucas A Maure; Rodolpho C Rodrigues; Ângelo V Alcântara; Bruno F C B Adorno; Douglas L Santos; Eduardo L Abreu; Rafael M Tanaka; Rute M Gonçalves; Erica Hasui
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Most species are not limited by an Amazonian river postulated to be a border between endemism areas.

Authors:  Sergio Santorelli; William E Magnusson; Claudia P Deus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Different environmental gradients affect different measures of snake β-diversity in the Amazon rainforests.

Authors:  Rafael de Fraga; Miquéias Ferrão; Adam J Stow; William E Magnusson; Albertina P Lima
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.