Literature DB >> 22611847

A comparison of land-sharing and land-sparing strategies for plant richness conservation in agricultural landscapes.

J Franklin Egan1, David A Mortensen.   

Abstract

Strategies for conserving plant diversity in agroecosystems generally focus on either expanding land area in non-crop habitat or enhancing diversity within crop fields through changes in within-field management practices. In this study, we compare effects on landscape-scale species richness from such land-sharing or land-sparing strategies. We collected data in arable field, grassland, pasture, and forest habitat types (1.6 ha sampled per habitat type) across a 100-km2 region of farmland in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, USA. We fitted species-area relationships (SARs) for each habitat type and then combined extrapolations from the curves with estimates of community overlap to estimate richness in a 314.5-ha landscape. We then modified these baseline estimates by adjusting parameters in the SAR models to compare potential effects of land-sharing and land-sparing conservation practices on landscape richness. We found that species richness of the habitat types showed a strong inverse relationship to the relative land area of each type in the region, with 89 species in arable fields (66.5% of total land area), 153 in pastures (6.7%), 196 in forests (5.2%), and 213 in grasslands (2.9%). Relative to the baseline scenario, major changes in the richness of arable fields produced gains in landscape-scale richness comparable to a conversion of 3.1% of arable field area into grassland habitat. Sensitivity analysis of our model indicated that relative gains from land sparing would be greatest in landscapes with a low amount of non-crop habitat in the baseline scenario, but that in more complex landscapes land sharing would provide greater gains. These results indicate that the majority of plant species in agroecosystems are found in small fragments of non-crop habitat and suggest that, especially in landscapes with little non-crop habitat, richness can be more readily conserved through land-sparing approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22611847     DOI: 10.1890/11-0206.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  7 in total

1.  Plant reproduction is altered by simulated herbicide drift to constructed plant communities.

Authors:  David Olszyk; Thomas Pfleeger; Tamotsu Shiroyama; Matthew Blakeley-Smith; E Henry Lee; Milton Plocher
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Glyphosate and dicamba herbicide tank mixture effects on native plant and non-genetically engineered soybean seedlings.

Authors:  David Olszyk; Thomas Pfleeger; E Henry Lee; Milton Plocher
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Incorporating Health Outcomes into Land-Use Planning.

Authors:  Max McClure; Catherine Machalaba; Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio; Yasha Feferholtz; Katherine D Lee; Peter Daszak; William B Karesh
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  Reconciling nature conservation and traditional farming practices: a spatially explicit framework to assess the extent of High Nature Value farmlands in the European countryside.

Authors:  Angela Lomba; Paulo Alves; Rob H G Jongman; David I McCracken
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Envisioning the Future of Mosaic Landscapes: Actor Perceptions in a Mixed Cocoa/Oil-Palm Area in Ghana.

Authors:  Kwabena O Asubonteng; Mirjam A F Ros-Tonen; Isa Baud; Karin Pfeffer
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Supporting crop pollinators with floral resources: network-based phenological matching.

Authors:  Laura Russo; Nelson Debarros; Suann Yang; Katriona Shea; David Mortensen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  The governance of land use strategies: Institutional and social dimensions of land sparing and land sharing.

Authors:  Tolera S Jiren; Ine Dorresteijn; Jannik Schultner; Joern Fischer
Journal:  Conserv Lett       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.105

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.