Literature DB >> 22611723

The ObGyn clerkship: are students denied the opportunity to provide patient care and what is the role of gender?

Xuezhi Jiang1, Christopher Altomare, James F X Egan, Deanna B Tocco, Peter F Schnatz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the frequency, and reasons that third-year medical students on an ObGyn clerkship are denied the opportunity to be involved in patient care.
METHODS: Students from four hospitals affiliated with the University of Connecticut Medical School completed an anonymous postclerkship survey.
RESULTS: Among the 157 students studied (66 males and 91 females), 51% (n = 80) were denied the opportunity to participate in a gynecologic examination and 47% (n = 73) were denied the opportunity for routine ObGyn care by patients. Among these students, 55% (n = 44) and 38% (n = 28) stated that being male was the reason they were excluded from gynecologic and routine care, respectively. Of the 80 students who were denied involvement in a gynecologic examination, 81% (n = 65) were denied involvement by clinic patients. Of the 44 males who stated they were denied the opportunity to be involved in a gynecologic examination due to their gender, 89% (n = 39) were refused by clinic patients. Compared with female students, male students are statistically more likely to be denied the opportunity to be involved in gynecologic examinations (RR = 1.69 [1.24-2.29]), especially by clinic patients (RR = 2.07 [1.41-3.03]).
CONCLUSION: A significant number of students were denied the opportunity to be involved in ObGyn care experiences. More frequently male students were denied involvement in care, with a higher incidence among clinic patients. We hypothesize that being denied involvement provides a negative perception of the ObGyn specialty, especially to male students, possibly affecting their decision to choose ObGyn training. PRECIS: A significant number of medical students, particularly males, were denied involvement in patient care, primarily by clinic patients, during the ObGyn clerkships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22611723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conn Med        ISSN: 0010-6178


  3 in total

1.  Assessing patients' preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider.

Authors:  Tanya P Hoke; Alexander A Berger; Christine C Pan; Lindsey A Jackson; William D Winkelman; Rachel High; Katherine A Volpe; Chee Paul Lin; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Psychiatric patients' perspectives of student involvement in their care.

Authors:  Caisa Öster; Susan Bäckström; Ingrid Lantz; Mia Ramklint
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 3.  Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician-gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brian T Nguyen; Laer H Streeter; Ravali A Reddy; Christopher R Douglas
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 1.884

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.