Literature DB >> 22611031

Estimated clinical benefit of protecting neurogenesis in the developing brain during radiation therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma.

Malin Blomstrand1, N Patrik Brodin, Per Munck Af Rosenschöld, Ivan R Vogelius, Gaspar Sánchez Merino, Anne Kiil-Berthlesen, Klas Blomgren, Birgitta Lannering, Søren M Bentzen, Thomas Björk-Eriksson.   

Abstract

We sought to assess the feasibility and estimate the benefit of sparing the neurogenic niches when irradiating the brain of pediatric patients with medulloblastoma (MB) based on clinical outcome data. Pediatric MB survivors experience a high risk of neurocognitive adverse effects, often attributed to the whole-brain irradiation that is part of standard management. Neurogenesis is very sensitive to radiation, and limiting the radiation dose to the hippocampus and the subventricular zone (SVZ) may preserve neurocognitive function. Radiotherapy plans were created using 4 techniques: standard opposing fields, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT), and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Mean dose to the hippocampus and SVZ (mean for both sites) could be limited to 88.3% (range, 83.6%-91.0%), 77.1% (range, 71.5%-81.3%), and 42.3% (range, 26.6%-51.2%) with IMAT, IMRT, and IMPT, respectively, while maintaining at least 95% of the prescribed dose in 95% of the whole-brain target volume. Estimated risks for developing memory impairment after a prescribed dose of 23.4 Gy were 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21%-69%), 44% (95% CI, 21%-65%), 41% (95% CI, 22%-60%), and 33% (95% CI, 23%-44%) with opposing fields, IMAT, IMRT, and IMPT, respectively. Neurogenic niche sparing during cranial irradiation of pediatric patients with MB is feasible and is estimated to lower the risks of long-term neurocognitive sequelae. Greatest sparing is achieved with intensity-modulated proton therapy, thus making this an attractive option to be tested in a prospective clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22611031      PMCID: PMC3379806          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  40 in total

1.  Neurocognitive consequences of risk-adapted therapy for childhood medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Raymond K Mulhern; Shawna L Palmer; Thomas E Merchant; Dana Wallace; Mehmet Kocak; Pim Brouwers; Kevin Krull; Murali Chintagumpala; Robyn Stargatt; David M Ashley; Vida L Tyc; Larry Kun; James Boyett; Amar Gajjar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Age-dependent sensitivity of the developing brain to irradiation is correlated with the number and vulnerability of progenitor cells.

Authors:  Aya Fukuda; Hirotsugu Fukuda; Janos Swanpalmer; Sven Hertzman; Birgitta Lannering; Ildiko Marky; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Klas Blomgren
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 3.  Radiation effects on neural precursor cells in the dentate gyrus.

Authors:  Marta Andres-Mach; Radoslaw Rola; John R Fike
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Adult-generated neurons in the dentate gyrus send axonal projections to field CA3 and are surrounded by synaptic vesicles.

Authors:  E A Markakis; F H Gage
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-04-19       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Therapeutic schedules influence the pattern of intellectual decline after irradiation of posterior fossa tumors.

Authors:  Virginie Kieffer-Renaux; Delphine Viguier; Marie-Anne Raquin; Anne Laurent-Vannier; Jean-Louis Habrand; Georges Dellatolas; Chantal Kalifa; Olivier Hartmann; Jacques Grill
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Long-term intellectual outcome in children with posterior fossa tumors according to radiation doses and volumes.

Authors:  J Grill; V K Renaux; C Bulteau; D Viguier; C Levy-Piebois; C Sainte-Rose; G Dellatolas; M A Raquin; I Jambaqué; C Kalifa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus.

Authors:  P S Eriksson; E Perfilieva; T Björk-Eriksson; A M Alborn; C Nordborg; D A Peterson; F H Gage
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  White matter anisotropy in post-treatment childhood cancer survivors: preliminary evidence of association with neurocognitive function.

Authors:  Pek-Lan Khong; Lucullus H T Leung; Amy S M Fung; Daniel Y T Fong; Deqiang Qiu; Dora L W Kwong; Gaik-Cheng Ooi; Grainne McAlonan; Grainne McAlanon; Guang Cao; Godfrey C F Chan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Cerebellar neurocognition: insights into the bottom of the brain.

Authors:  Hanne Baillieux; Hyo Jung De Smet; Philippe F Paquier; Peter P De Deyn; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  Proton versus photon radiotherapy for common pediatric brain tumors: comparison of models of dose characteristics and their relationship to cognitive function.

Authors:  Thomas E Merchant; Chia-Ho Hua; Hemant Shukla; Xiaofei Ying; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.167

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Proton therapy for the treatment of children with CNS malignancies.

Authors:  Radhika Sreeraman; Daniel J Indelicato
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-03

Review 2.  Hippocampus sparing in whole-brain radiotherapy. A review.

Authors:  F Oskan; U Ganswindt; S B Schwarz; F Manapov; C Belka; M Niyazi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Defining functional changes in the brain caused by targeted stereotaxic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Vipan K Parihar; Munjal M Acharya; Dante E Roa; Omar Bosch; Lori-Ann Christie; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 1.241

4.  Hippocampal sparing radiotherapy for pediatric medulloblastoma: impact of treatment margins and treatment technique.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Per Munck af Rosenschöld; Malin Blomstrand; Anne Kiil-Berthlesen; Christian Hollensen; Ivan R Vogelius; Birgitta Lannering; Søren M Bentzen; Thomas Björk-Eriksson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Clinical controversies: proton therapy for pediatric tumors.

Authors:  Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.934

6.  Reirradiation of recurrent medulloblastoma: does clinical benefit outweigh risk for toxicity?

Authors:  Cynthia Wetmore; Danielle Herington; Tong Lin; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Amar Gajjar; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Transplantation of human fetal-derived neural stem cells improves cognitive function following cranial irradiation.

Authors:  Munjal M Acharya; Lori-Ann Christie; Thomas G Hazel; Karl K Johe; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Long-term effects of ionising radiation on the brain: cause for concern?

Authors:  Stefan J Kempf; Omid Azimzadeh; Michael J Atkinson; Soile Tapio
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation on overall survival in children with choroid plexus carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew Z Sun; Michael E Ivan; Michael C Oh; Arthur R Delance; Aaron J Clark; Michael Safaee; Taemin Oh; Gurvinder Kaur; Annette Molinaro; Nalin Gupta; Andrew T Parsa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Delayed cognitive deficits can be alleviated by calcium antagonist nimodipine by downregulation of apoptosis following whole brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jing Tong; Juan Li; Qiu-Shi Zhang; Jian-Kai Yang; Lei Zhang; Hai-Ying Liu; Ying-Zi Liu; Jiang-Wei Yuan; Xu-Ming Su; Xue-Xin Zhang; Bao-Hua Jiao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.