Literature DB >> 22610423

Flexible protein docking refinement using pose-dependent normal mode analysis.

Vishwesh Venkatraman1, David W Ritchie.   

Abstract

Modeling conformational changes in protein docking calculations is challenging. To make the calculations tractable, most current docking algorithms typically treat proteins as rigid bodies and use soft scoring functions that implicitly accommodate some degree of flexibility. Alternatively, ensembles of structures generated from molecular dynamics (MD) may be cross-docked. However, such combinatorial approaches can produce many thousands or even millions of docking poses, and require fast and sensitive scoring functions to distinguish them. Here, we present a novel approach called "EigenHex," which is based on normal mode analyses (NMAs) of a simple elastic network model of protein flexibility. We initially assume that the proteins to be docked are rigid, and we begin by performing conventional soft docking using the Hex polar Fourier correlation algorithm. We then apply a pose-dependent NMA to each of the top 1000 rigid body docking solutions, and we sample and re-score multiple perturbed docking conformations generated from linear combinations of up to 20 eigenvectors using a multi-threaded particle swarm optimization algorithm. When applied to the 63 "rigid body" targets of the Protein Docking Benchmark version 2.0, our results show that sampling and re-scoring from just one to three eigenvectors gives a modest but consistent improvement for these targets. Thus, pose-dependent NMA avoids the need to sample multiple eigenvectors and it offers a promising alternative to combinatorial cross-docking.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22610423     DOI: 10.1002/prot.24115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  14 in total

1.  Bayesian Active Learning for Optimization and Uncertainty Quantification in Protein Docking.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Yang Shen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 2.  Receptor-ligand molecular docking.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Camila S de Magalhães; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-12-21

3.  Structural quality of unrefined models in protein docking.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-11-13

Review 4.  Software for molecular docking: a review.

Authors:  Nataraj S Pagadala; Khajamohiddin Syed; Jack Tuszynski
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-01-16

5.  Efficient flexible backbone protein-protein docking for challenging targets.

Authors:  Nicholas A Marze; Shourya S Roy Burman; William Sheffler; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Predicting Protein Functional Motions: an Old Recipe with a New Twist.

Authors:  Sergei Grudinin; Elodie Laine; Alexandre Hoffmann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Flexible Backbone Assembly and Refinement of Symmetrical Homomeric Complexes.

Authors:  Shourya S Roy Burman; Remy A Yovanno; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Induced fit with replica exchange improves protein complex structure prediction.

Authors:  Ameya Harmalkar; Sai Pooja Mahajan; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.779

9.  Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking.

Authors:  Daisuke Kuroda; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  SIMS: a hybrid method for rapid conformational analysis.

Authors:  Bryant Gipson; Mark Moll; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.