PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is convincing evidence linking early start of fluid resuscitation and initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy to improved outcomes in patients with sepsis in the emergency department. Blood biomarkers measured on admission and during follow-up have the ability to guide early sepsis recognition, severity assessment and therapeutic decisions in individual patients and may allow transition from bundled sepsis care to more individualized management in single patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Although a large number of promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers have been put forward in observational studies, only few have been evaluated in prospective randomized-controlled intervention trials. Markers such as lactate for risk stratification and guidance of fluid resuscitation, procalcitonin for assessing risk of bacterial infections and guiding therapeutic decisions about initiation and duration of antimicrobial therapy, and recently proadrenomedullin for early mortality prediction and site-of-care decisions in respiratory infections, have shown to improve patient management. SUMMARY: For few biomarkers, recent study results demonstrate that well defined clinical protocols have the potential to guide decisions about the individual risk stratification and treatment of patients with suspicion of sepsis ultimately leading to improved patient care and outcomes. For other biomarkers, promising observation data have been put forward, but their potential needs to be evaluated in large-scale, well designed prospective intervention studies before clinical use can be recommended.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is convincing evidence linking early start of fluid resuscitation and initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy to improved outcomes in patients with sepsis in the emergency department. Blood biomarkers measured on admission and during follow-up have the ability to guide early sepsis recognition, severity assessment and therapeutic decisions in individual patients and may allow transition from bundled sepsis care to more individualized management in single patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Although a large number of promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers have been put forward in observational studies, only few have been evaluated in prospective randomized-controlled intervention trials. Markers such as lactate for risk stratification and guidance of fluid resuscitation, procalcitonin for assessing risk of bacterial infections and guiding therapeutic decisions about initiation and duration of antimicrobial therapy, and recently proadrenomedullin for early mortality prediction and site-of-care decisions in respiratory infections, have shown to improve patient management. SUMMARY: For few biomarkers, recent study results demonstrate that well defined clinical protocols have the potential to guide decisions about the individual risk stratification and treatment of patients with suspicion of sepsis ultimately leading to improved patient care and outcomes. For other biomarkers, promising observation data have been put forward, but their potential needs to be evaluated in large-scale, well designed prospective intervention studies before clinical use can be recommended.
Authors: Shuangchun Yan; Amy Tsurumi; Yok-Ai Que; Colleen M Ryan; Arunava Bandyopadhaya; Alexander A Morgan; Patrick J Flaherty; Ronald G Tompkins; Laurence G Rahme Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Philipp Schuetz; Pierre Hausfater; Devendra Amin; Sebastian Haubitz; Lukas Fässler; Eva Grolimund; Alexander Kutz; Ursula Schild; Zeljka Caldara; Katharina Regez; Andriy Zhydkov; Timo Kahles; Krassen Nedeltchev; Stefanie von Felten; Sabina De Geest; Antoinette Conca; Petra Schäfer-Keller; Andreas Huber; Mario Bargetzi; Ulrich Buergi; Gabrielle Sauvin; Pasqualina Perrig-Chiello; Barbara Reutlinger; Beat Mueller Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2013-07-04
Authors: Mina Hur; Hanah Kim; Hyun Jeong Kim; Hyun Suk Yang; Laura Magrini; Rossella Marino; Patrizia Cardelli; Salvatore Di Somma Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Anna Christina Rast; Alexander Kutz; Susan Felder; Lukas Faessler; Deborah Steiner; Svenja Laukemann; Sebastian Haubitz; Andreas Huber; Ulrich Buergi; Antoinette Conca; Barbara Reutlinger; Beat Mueller; Mario Bargetzi; Philipp Schuetz Journal: Dis Markers Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 3.434
Authors: Chun Mei Jia; Shun Yi Feng; Yong Li; Zong Xun Cao; Cheng Pu Wu; Yan Zhao Zhai; Jie Cui; Meng Zhang; Jie Gao Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.817