Literature DB >> 22610274

Outcome of sentinel lymph node biopsy and prognostic implications of regression in thin malignant melanoma.

Susannah E McClain1, Amber L Shada, Megan Barry, James W Patterson, Craig L Slingluff.   

Abstract

Thin melanomas with partial or complete regression may provide clues about antitumor immunity, but their management remains controversial. We have characterized the management and clinical outcomes of regressed thin (<1 mm) T1a melanomas and hypothesized that regression increases the risk of regional metastases when compared with nonregressed thin melanomas. A prospectively collected clinical database was reviewed, and T1a melanomas with regression were identified. Histology, surgical approach, outcome, and survival were evaluated. The primary outcome measures were sentinel node positivity, subsequent lymph node metastasis, and survival. A total of 75 patients with T1a or in-situ melanomas were grouped into three subsets. Group 1: 35 underwent a sentinel node biopsy (SNBx), none of which were positive. No patients developed nodal recurrence. The 5-year survival of this group was 93%, with a median follow-up of 52 months. Group 2: 31 were followed up without SNBx; two developed regional nodal disease (6.5%), neither of whom died of subsequent distant disease. The 5-year survival was 89%, with a median follow-up of 38 months. There was no significant difference in the survival between groups 1 and 2. Group 3: nine patients presented with metastatic disease concurrent with a regressed thin melanoma. These patients had a median survival of 2.3 years and a 4-year survival estimate of 22%. Regression should not be used as an indication for SNBx in T1a melanomas; we recommend that such patients be managed with wide local excision and a long-term clinical follow-up. The poor prognosis of thin regressed primary melanoma with simultaneous metastatic disease may indicate the existence of immune escape phenotypes supporting melanoma progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22610274      PMCID: PMC4465915          DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e328353e673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  55 in total

1.  The correlation of regression in primary melanoma with sentinel lymph node status.

Authors:  C Kaur; R J Thomas; N Desai; M A Green; D Lovell; B W E M Powell; M G Cook
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Sentinel node biopsy for thin melanomas: which patients should be considered?

Authors:  Christopher A Puleo; Jane L Messina; Adam I Riker; L Frank Glass; Christopher Nelson; C Wayne Cruse; Timothy M Johnson; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 3.  Mechanisms of tumor escape: role of tumor microenvironment in inducing apoptosis of cytolytic effector cells.

Authors:  Alessandro Poggi; Maria Raffaella Zocchi
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Regression in malignant melanoma. A histologic feature without independent prognostic significance.

Authors:  J W Kelly; R W Sagebiel; M S Blois
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Thin (less than or equal to 1 mm) melanomas of the extremities are biologically favorable lesions not influenced by regression.

Authors:  H J Wanebo; P H Cooper; R W Hagar
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Primary cutaneous melanoma with regression does not require a lower threshold for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Katherine T Morris; Klaus J Busam; Suzannah Bero; Ami Patel; Mary S Brady
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Results of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thin melanoma.

Authors:  Sandra L Wong; Mary S Brady; Klaus J Busam; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Tumour regression does not increase the risk of sentinel node involvement in thin melanomas.

Authors:  Roberto Cecchi; Mario Pavesi; Lauro Buralli; Stefania Innocenti; Cataldo De Gaudio
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

9.  Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node positivity in thin melanoma (<or=1 mm).

Authors:  Melanie A Warycha; Jan Zakrzewski; Quanhong Ni; Richard L Shapiro; Russell S Berman; Anna C Pavlick; David Polsky; Madhu Mazumdar; Iman Osman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Predictors of regional nodal disease in patients with thin melanomas.

Authors:  Giorgos C Karakousis; Phyllis A Gimotty; Jeffrey D Botbyl; Susan B Kesmodel; David E Elder; Rosalie Elenitsas; Michael E Ming; DuPont Guerry; Douglas L Fraker; Brian J Czerniecki; Francis R Spitz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  6 in total

1.  Melanoma metastasis to the gastric mucosa preceded by guillain-barré as a paraneoplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Rodrigo Kraft Rovere; Maria Eduarda Pires de Souza; Sara Fernanda Hilgert; Yasmine Rodrigues Chamse Ddine; Adma Silva de Lima
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09

2.  Regression in primary cutaneous melanoma: etiopathogenesis and clinical significance.

Authors:  Phyu P Aung; Priyadharsini Nagarajan; Victor G Prieto
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.662

3.  Localization of the Sentinel Lymph Node in Melanoma Without Blue Dye.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Patrick D Melmer; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Impact of the 2009 (7th edition) AJCC melanoma staging system in the classification of thin cutaneous melanomas.

Authors:  Vicki H Chu; Michael T Tetzlaff; Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Victor G Prieto; Roland Bassett; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Michael S McLemore; Doina Ivan; Wei-Lien Billy Wang; Merrick I Ross; Jonathan L Curry
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Presence of immune cells, low tumor proliferation and wild type BRAF mutation status is associated with a favourable clinical outcome in stage III cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Johan Falkenius; Hemming Johansson; Rainer Tuominen; Marianne Frostvik Stolt; Johan Hansson; Suzanne Egyhazi Brage
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Prognostic significance of regression and mitotic rate in head and neck cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kim; Isaac Obermeyer; Nathan Rubin; Samir S Khariwala
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.