OBJECTIVES: To assess the merit of a novel single-epitope sandwich (SES) assay specific to the stable part of BNP in patients with reversible myocardial ischemia as post-translational modifications of BNP may influence assay performance. DESIGN AND METHODS: We measured BNP concentration by a conventional assay and the SES-BNP assay in 198 patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). BNP concentration was determined before and immediately after exercise stress testing, and 1.5 and 4.5h later. Patients were categorized according to MPI results. RESULTS: BNP concentration was higher with both assays at all time points in patients with reversible myocardial ischemia (n=19) compared to the other patients (n=179). Measuring BNP after stress testing or calculating the changes in BNP concentration did not improve diagnostic accuracy compared to baseline measurements: SES-BNP: AUC 0.71 (95% CI 0.58-0.84) vs. conventional BNP: 0.71 (0.59-0.83), p=0.96. By linear regression analysis, reversible myocardial ischemia was significantly associated with baseline SES-BNP concentration (p=0.043), but not with measurements by the conventional assay (p=0.089). In multivariate logistic regression models, only baseline measurement with the SES-BNP assay was significantly associated with reversible myocardial ischemia: odds ratio [logarithmical transformed BNP] 2.00 (95% CI 1.16-3.47), p=0.013. The SES-BNP assay, but not the conventional BNP assay, reclassified a significant proportion of the patients towards their correct category on top of the best clinical model of our data set: NRI=0.47, p=0.04. CONCLUSIONS: The SES-BNP assay was significantly associated with reversible myocardial ischemia as assessed by several statistical indices, while a conventional BNP assay was not.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the merit of a novel single-epitope sandwich (SES) assay specific to the stable part of BNP in patients with reversible myocardial ischemia as post-translational modifications of BNP may influence assay performance. DESIGN AND METHODS: We measured BNP concentration by a conventional assay and the SES-BNP assay in 198 patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). BNP concentration was determined before and immediately after exercise stress testing, and 1.5 and 4.5h later. Patients were categorized according to MPI results. RESULTS:BNP concentration was higher with both assays at all time points in patients with reversible myocardial ischemia (n=19) compared to the other patients (n=179). Measuring BNP after stress testing or calculating the changes in BNP concentration did not improve diagnostic accuracy compared to baseline measurements: SES-BNP: AUC 0.71 (95% CI 0.58-0.84) vs. conventional BNP: 0.71 (0.59-0.83), p=0.96. By linear regression analysis, reversible myocardial ischemia was significantly associated with baseline SES-BNP concentration (p=0.043), but not with measurements by the conventional assay (p=0.089). In multivariate logistic regression models, only baseline measurement with the SES-BNP assay was significantly associated with reversible myocardial ischemia: odds ratio [logarithmical transformed BNP] 2.00 (95% CI 1.16-3.47), p=0.013. The SES-BNP assay, but not the conventional BNP assay, reclassified a significant proportion of the patients towards their correct category on top of the best clinical model of our data set: NRI=0.47, p=0.04. CONCLUSIONS: The SES-BNP assay was significantly associated with reversible myocardial ischemia as assessed by several statistical indices, while a conventional BNP assay was not.
Authors: Alexander van Reenen; Mario Berger; Emmanuel Moreau; Edwin Bekx; Tom Bruinink; Danielle Kemper; Lian van Lippen; Jos Weusten; Anita Mrakovic; Etienne Michielsen; Joost Vissers; Femke de Theije; Jeroen Nieuwenhuis; Veronique Semjonow; Johannes Mair Journal: Pract Lab Med Date: 2019-03-17