Literature DB >> 22609577

Auditory skills and brain morphology predict individual differences in adaptation to degraded speech.

Julia Erb1, Molly J Henry, Frank Eisner, Jonas Obleser.   

Abstract

Noise-vocoded speech is a spectrally highly degraded signal, but it preserves the temporal envelope of speech. Listeners vary considerably in their ability to adapt to this degraded speech signal. Here, we hypothesised that individual differences in adaptation to vocoded speech should be predictable by non-speech auditory, cognitive, and neuroanatomical factors. We tested 18 normal-hearing participants in a short-term vocoded speech-learning paradigm (listening to 100 4-band-vocoded sentences). Non-speech auditory skills were assessed using amplitude modulation (AM) rate discrimination, where modulation rates were centred on the speech-relevant rate of 4 Hz. Working memory capacities were evaluated (digit span and nonword repetition), and structural MRI scans were examined for anatomical predictors of vocoded speech learning using voxel-based morphometry. Listeners who learned faster to understand degraded speech also showed smaller thresholds in the AM discrimination task. This ability to adjust to degraded speech is furthermore reflected anatomically in increased grey matter volume in an area of the left thalamus (pulvinar) that is strongly connected to the auditory and prefrontal cortices. Thus, individual non-speech auditory skills and left thalamus grey matter volume can predict how quickly a listener adapts to degraded speech.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22609577     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  19 in total

1.  Impaired perceptual phonetic plasticity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Christopher C Heffner; Emily B Myers; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Brendan P O'Connell; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Joseph Hopfinger
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Thalamus is a common locus of reading, arithmetic, and IQ: Analysis of local intrinsic functional properties.

Authors:  Maki S Koyama; Peter J Molfese; Michael P Milham; W Einar Mencl; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Neural correlates of adaptation in freely-moving normal hearing subjects under cochlear implant acoustic simulations.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Thomas M Talavage; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Upregulation of cognitive control networks in older adults' speech comprehension.

Authors:  Julia Erb; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24

6.  Left temporal alpha-band activity reflects single word intelligibility.

Authors:  Robert Becker; Maria Pefkou; Christoph M Michel; Alexis G Hervais-Adelman
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-27

7.  Simultaneous EEG-fMRI brain signatures of auditory cue utilization.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Björn Herrmann; Till Nierhaus; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Individual Variability in Recalibrating to Spectrally Shifted Speech: Implications for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Audiovisual cues benefit recognition of accented speech in noise but not perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Briony Banks; Emma Gowen; Kevin J Munro; Patti Adank
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Relationship between perceptual learning in speech and statistical learning in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Thordis M Neger; Toni Rietveld; Esther Janse
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.