Literature DB >> 22609178

Heart-lung interactions and pulmonary buffering: lessons from a computational modeling study.

Sheldon Magder1, Brent Guerard.   

Abstract

Our objective was to separate mechanical effects on the circulation that are due to increases in pleural pressure (Ppl) from those due to increases in transpulmonary pressure (Ptp). We used a computational model of the circulation (Magder et al., 2009) which includes four static elastic compartments (systemic and pulmonary arteries and veins) and two time-varying elastances to represent the ventricles. Changes in Ppl were modeled by increasing pressure in all thoracic compartments and changes in Ptp by increasing the pressure around the pulmonary venous compliant region. When Ptp was >pulmonary venous pressure (Pvp) a switch function created the equivalent of West zone II in pulmonary vessels. Cyclic increases in Ppl or Ptp produced systolic arterial pressure variations (SPV). However, with Ppl systolic pressure fell during expiration and average pulmonary venous pressure (Pvp) decreased, whereas with cyclic Ptp systolic pressure fell during inspiration and average Pvp increased. Increases in pulmonary vascular volume reduced SPV due to cyclic Ppl, which we call pulmonary buffering, but not in those due to cyclic changes in Ptp. In conclusion, cyclic increases in Ptp produce volume sensitive SPV whereas cyclic changes in Ptp produce non-volume responsive SPV. Cyclic Ppl decrease whereas cyclic Ptp increase pulmonary vascular volume.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22609178     DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2012.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol        ISSN: 1569-9048            Impact factor:   1.931


  9 in total

Review 1.  Heart-Lung interaction in spontaneous breathing subjects: the basics.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 2.  Physiology-guided management of hemodynamics in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Gustavo A Cortes-Puentes; Richard A Oeckler; John J Marini
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

3.  Inspiratory preload obliteration may injure lungs via cyclical "on-off" vascular flow.

Authors:  B H Katira; W M Kuebler; B P Kavanagh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Cardiac disorders worsen the final outcome in myasthenic crisis undergoing non-invasive mechanical ventilation: a retrospective 20-year study from a single center.

Authors:  Erika Iori; Alessandra Ariatti; Marco Mazzoli; Elisabetta Bastia; Manuela Gozzi; Virginia Agnoletto; Alessandro Marchioni; Giuliana Galassi
Journal:  Acta Myol       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 5.  Experts' opinion on management of hemodynamics in ARDS patients: focus on the effects of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  A Vieillard-Baron; M Matthay; J L Teboul; T Bein; M Schultz; S Magder; J J Marini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Heart-lung interactions during mechanical ventilation: the basics.

Authors:  Syed S Mahmood; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

7.  Prognostic classification based on P/F and PEEP in invasively ventilated ICU patients with hypoxemia-insights from the MARS study.

Authors:  Fabienne D Simonis; Laura R A Schouten; Olaf L Cremer; David S Y Ong; Gabriele Amoruso; Gilda Cinella; Marcus J Schultz; Lieuwe D Bos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 8.  Volume and its relationship to cardiac output and venous return.

Authors:  S Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  The meaning of blood pressure.

Authors:  S Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.