BACKGROUND: Disparities in receipt of preventive services by people with mental illness have been documented previously. However, whether these disparities extend to screening mammography among individuals experiencing comparable barriers to accessing care has not been examined fully. PURPOSE: To determine whether disparities exist in receipt of screening mammography between women with and without mental illness enrolled in Medicaid, a program with documented potential to reduce healthcare disparities. METHODS: Receipt of screening mammography was examined among women aged 50-64 years enrolled in Ohio's Medicaid program during the years 2002-2008 (n=130,088). Receipt of annual screening mammography was examined among those with at least one screening mammography during the study period. Mental illness was identified through diagnostic, service, and pharmacotherapy codes (n=61,661). RESULTS: Compared to women without mental illness, more women with mental illness received at least one screening mammography during the study period (31.7% vs 38.1%, p<0.001). However, after adjusting for potential confounders, including the presence of comorbid conditions and length of enrollment in Medicaid, women with mental illness were 32% less likely to undergo at least one screening mammography (AOR=0.68, 95% CI=0.66, 0.70). Among those who received at least one screening mammography, fewer women with mental illness received screening mammography on an annual basis (5.9% vs 12.7%, p<0.001; AOR=0.53, 95% CI=0.49, 0.56). For all beneficiaries, each year of enrollment in Medicaid increased the likelihood of screening mammography use by at least 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid beneficiaries with mental illness constitute a particularly vulnerable population for suboptimal breast cancer screening.
BACKGROUND: Disparities in receipt of preventive services by people with mental illness have been documented previously. However, whether these disparities extend to screening mammography among individuals experiencing comparable barriers to accessing care has not been examined fully. PURPOSE: To determine whether disparities exist in receipt of screening mammography between women with and without mental illness enrolled in Medicaid, a program with documented potential to reduce healthcare disparities. METHODS: Receipt of screening mammography was examined among women aged 50-64 years enrolled in Ohio's Medicaid program during the years 2002-2008 (n=130,088). Receipt of annual screening mammography was examined among those with at least one screening mammography during the study period. Mental illness was identified through diagnostic, service, and pharmacotherapy codes (n=61,661). RESULTS: Compared to women without mental illness, more women with mental illness received at least one screening mammography during the study period (31.7% vs 38.1%, p<0.001). However, after adjusting for potential confounders, including the presence of comorbid conditions and length of enrollment in Medicaid, women with mental illness were 32% less likely to undergo at least one screening mammography (AOR=0.68, 95% CI=0.66, 0.70). Among those who received at least one screening mammography, fewer women with mental illness received screening mammography on an annual basis (5.9% vs 12.7%, p<0.001; AOR=0.53, 95% CI=0.49, 0.56). For all beneficiaries, each year of enrollment in Medicaid increased the likelihood of screening mammography use by at least 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid beneficiaries with mental illness constitute a particularly vulnerable population for suboptimal breast cancer screening.
Authors: Siran M Koroukian; Paul M Bakaki; Negar Golchin; Carl V Tyler; Cynthia Owusu; Sana Loue Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Patrick W Corrigan; Dinesh Mittal; Christina M Reaves; Tiffany F Haynes; Xiaotong Han; Scott Morris; Greer Sullivan Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: J Konadu Fokuo; Virginia Goldrick; Jeanette Rossetti; Carol Wahlstrom; Carla Kundert; Jonathon Larson; Patrick Corrigan Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2016-06-01
Authors: Fahrin Ramadan Andiwijaya; Calum Davey; Khaoula Bessame; Abdourahmane Ndong; Hannah Kuper Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Agnes Grudniewicz; Allie Peckham; David Rudoler; M Ruth Lavergne; Rachelle Ashcroft; Kimberly Corace; Mark Kaluzienski; Ridhwana Kaoser; Lucie Langford; Rita McCracken; W Craig Norris; Anne O'Riordan; Kevin Patrick; Sandra Peterson; Ellen Randall; Jennifer Rayner; Christian G Schütz; Nadiya Sunderji; Helen Thai; Paul Kurdyak Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 3.006