Literature DB >> 22608170

What do physiotherapists consider to be the best sitting spinal posture?

Kieran O'Sullivan1, Peter O'Sullivan, Leonard O'Sullivan, Wim Dankaerts.   

Abstract

While sitting is a common aggravating factor in low back pain (LBP), the best sitting posture remains unclear. This study investigated the perceptions of 295 physiotherapists in four different European countries on sitting posture. Physiotherapists selected their perceived best sitting posture from a sample of nine options that ranged from slumped to upright sitting, as well as completing the back beliefs questionnaire (BBQ). 85% of physiotherapists selected one of two postures as best, with one posture being selected significantly more frequently than the remainder (p < 0.05). Interestingly, these two most frequently selected postures were very different from each other. Those who selected the more upright sitting posture had more negative LBP beliefs on the BBQ (p < 0.05). The choice of best sitting posture also varied between countries (p < 0.05). Overall, disagreement remains on what constitutes a neutral spine posture, and what is the best sitting posture. Qualitative comments indicated that sitting postures which matched the natural shape of the spine, and appeared comfortable and/or relaxed without excessive muscle tone were often deemed advantageous. Further research on the perceptions of people with LBP on sitting posture are indicated.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22608170     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  11 in total

1.  Lower spinal postural variability during laptop-work in subjects with cervicogenic headache compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Age-related Changes in Maximum Pelvic Anteversion and Retroversion Angles Measured in the Sitting Position.

Authors:  Hitoshi Asai; Hiroyuki Tsuchiyama; Tomoyuki Hatakeyama; Pleiades Tiharu Inaoka; Kanichirou Murata
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-12-25

3.  Kinematic analysis of head, trunk, and pelvic motion during mirror therapy for stroke patients.

Authors:  Jinmin Kim; Jaehoon Yi; Chang-Ho Song
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-10-21

4.  Evaluation of factors associated with severe and frequent back pain in high school athletes.

Authors:  Matias Noll; Erika Aparecida Silveira; Ivan Silveira de Avelar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sagittal spine shape literacy in the general adult population, assessed by a novel, simple graphical tool.

Authors:  Larry Cohen; Evangelos Pappas; Milena Simic; Kathryn Refshauge; Sarah Dennis
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Respiratory chest movement measurement as a chair quality indicator--preliminary observations.

Authors:  Elżbieta Szczygieł; Katarzyna Zielonka; Tadeusz Mazur; Sylwia Mętel; Joanna Golec
Journal:  Int J Occup Saf Ergon       Date:  2015

Review 7.  Evidence-informed physical therapy management of performance-related musculoskeletal disorders in musicians.

Authors:  Cliffton Chan; Bronwen Ackermann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-08

8.  Three-dimensional change in the cervical spine in a cross-legged sitting position after a time lapse.

Authors:  Seo-Young Jung; Bo-Ram Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-05-31

9.  The Short Term Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Effects of Prolonged Sitting During Office Computer Work.

Authors:  Richelle Baker; Pieter Coenen; Erin Howie; Ann Williamson; Leon Straker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Teachers' Perspective on Strategies to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Educational Institutions.

Authors:  Nastja Podrekar; Kaja Kastelic; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.