OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different finishing procedures on the wear behavior of zirconia against natural enamel. METHODS: 64 quadratic specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm) were cut from a commercial hipped dental Y-TZP ceramic. Four different groups with 16 specimens each were formed according to the following finishing procedures: PZ (polished), RR (fine-grit diamond), GR (coarse-grit diamond), GZ (glazed). Polished specimens of a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (Empress CAD) were used as a control (GC). The materials were subjected to the Ivoclar wear method (Willytec chewing simulator, 120,000 cycles, 5kg weight) with 80 natural caries-free cusps of first upper molars as antagonists. Wear was analyzed for both the enamel cusps and test specimens by measurement of the vertical substance loss with a laser scanner. Surface roughness was measured by means of a white-light interferometer. RESULTS: The surface roughness was significantly different among the polished, diamond-finished, and glazed ceramic specimens (ANOVA, post hoc Bonferroni p<0.05). The results of the one-way ANOVA indicated that the finishing technique significantly affected enamel wear (p<0.05). The post hoc test indicated that the specimens finished with the coarse diamond caused significantly higher antagonist wear than the polished ones. Polished zirconia showed the lowest wear of the antagonist enamel, with a mean value of 171.74 (SD = 121.68), and resulted in enamel wear that was not significantly different from that of the glass ceramic control group. No significant linear correlation could be found between pre-testing surface roughness and abrasive wear. SIGNIFICANCE: If zirconia is used without veneering material for crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), the surface must be well-polished if occlusal adjustments with coarse diamonds are performed. The polishing step reduces the wear of the opposing enamel.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different finishing procedures on the wear behavior of zirconia against natural enamel. METHODS: 64 quadratic specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm) were cut from a commercial hipped dental Y-TZP ceramic. Four different groups with 16 specimens each were formed according to the following finishing procedures: PZ (polished), RR (fine-grit diamond), GR (coarse-grit diamond), GZ (glazed). Polished specimens of a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (Empress CAD) were used as a control (GC). The materials were subjected to the Ivoclar wear method (Willytec chewing simulator, 120,000 cycles, 5kg weight) with 80 natural caries-free cusps of first upper molars as antagonists. Wear was analyzed for both the enamel cusps and test specimens by measurement of the vertical substance loss with a laser scanner. Surface roughness was measured by means of a white-light interferometer. RESULTS: The surface roughness was significantly different among the polished, diamond-finished, and glazed ceramic specimens (ANOVA, post hoc Bonferroni p<0.05). The results of the one-way ANOVA indicated that the finishing technique significantly affected enamel wear (p<0.05). The post hoc test indicated that the specimens finished with the coarse diamond caused significantly higher antagonist wear than the polished ones. Polished zirconia showed the lowest wear of the antagonist enamel, with a mean value of 171.74 (SD = 121.68), and resulted in enamel wear that was not significantly different from that of the glass ceramic control group. No significant linear correlation could be found between pre-testing surface roughness and abrasive wear. SIGNIFICANCE: If zirconia is used without veneering material for crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), the surface must be well-polished if occlusal adjustments with coarse diamonds are performed. The polishing step reduces the wear of the opposing enamel.
Authors: J F Esquivel-Upshaw; M J Kim; S M Hsu; N Abdulhameed; R Jenkins; D Neal; F Ren; A E Clark Journal: J Dent Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Zhongxiao Peng; Muhammad Izzat Abdul Rahman; Yu Zhang; Ling Yin Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 3.368