Literature DB >> 22607911

Combined modality treatment for PET-positive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: favorable outcomes of combined modality treatment for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and positive interim or postchemotherapy FDG-PET.

Lia M Halasz1, Heather A Jacene, Paul J Catalano, Annick D Van den Abbeele, Ann Lacasce, Peter M Mauch, Andrea K Ng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of patients treated for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with combined modality therapy based on [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-2-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We studied 59 patients with aggressive NHL, who received chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) from 2001 to 2008. Among them, 83% of patients had stage I/II disease. Patients with B-cell lymphoma received R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)-based chemotherapy, and 1 patient with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic T-cell lymphoma received CHOP therapy. Interim and postchemotherapy FDG-PET or FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) scans were performed for restaging. All patients received consolidated involved-field RT. Median RT dose was 36 Gy (range, 28.8-50 Gy). Progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) rates were calculated with and without a negative interim or postchemotherapy FDG-PET scan.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 46.5 months. Thirty-nine patients had negative FDG-PET results by the end of chemotherapy, including 12 patients who had a negative interim FDG-PET scan and no postchemotherapy PET. Twenty patients were FDG-PET-positive, including 7 patients with positive interim FDG-PET and no postchemotherapy FDG-PET scans. The 3-year actuarial PFS rates for patients with negative versus positive FDG-PET scans were 97% and 90%, respectively. The 3-year actuarial LC rates for patients with negative versus positive FDG-PET scans were 100% and 90%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had a positive interim or postchemotherapy FDG-PET had a PFS rate of 90% at 3 years after combined modality treatment, suggesting that a large proportion of these patients can be cured with consolidated RT.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22607911     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

Review 1.  Consolidative Radiation in DLBCL: Evidence-Based Recommendations.

Authors:  David C Hodgson; N George Mikhaeel
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Does Radiation Have a Role in Advanced Stage Hodgkin's or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma?

Authors:  Lena Specht
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01

Review 3.  [Rational imaging of metastasized tumor diseases].

Authors:  H J Stemmler; M Schlemmer; S Reilich
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for staging and evaluation of response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marilyn J Siegel; Clint E Jokerst; Dhana Rajderkar; Charles F Hildebolt; Sagun Goyal; Farrokh Dehdashti; Nina Wagner Johnston; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 5.  Is there a role for consolidative radiotherapy in the treatment of aggressive and localized non-Hodgkin lymphoma? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucas Vieira dos Santos; João Paulo da Silveira Nogueira Lima; Carmen Sílvia Passos Lima; Emma Chen Sasse; André Deeke Sasse
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.