Literature DB >> 22606853

Age-related differences in temporomandibular disorder diagnoses.

Luca Guarda-Nardini1, Fabio Piccotti, Giorgia Mogno, Lorenzo Favero, Daniele Manfredini.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the pattern of age distribution of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and to identify prevalence peaks for the different diagnoses. The study sample (N = 383; F:M ratio = 3.9; mean age range 41.7 +/- 17 years) consisted of patients seeking treatment for TMD and who were assessed in accordance with the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) version 1.0 guidelines. The sample was divided into four age groups on the basis of percentile-derived intervals to compare prevalence of different diagnoses in relation to age. The pattern of clinical diagnoses changed with increasing age. The peculiar distribution of RDC/TMD axis I diagnoses, with relation to age, mainly affected the disorders trend of groups II and III, with the former decreasing with age from about 62% to 40% and the latter increasing from 75% to almost 95%. Two distinct age peaks were identified for the prevalence of the main clinical marker of group III diagnosis of arthrosis/arthritis, viz., joint crepitus sounds (N = 104, mean age range 51.9 +/- 14.5), and for the prevalence of all other diagnoses in patients without joint crepitus (N = 279, mean age range 37.9 +/- 16.4). The hypothesis that TMD patient populations may be composed of at least two diagnostic subgroups in relation to age, and that the presence of clinically diagnosed degenerative joint disorders may be a key discriminating factor, was supported. The external validity of the results from this investigation needs to be confirmed by multicenter and cross-cultural studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22606853     DOI: 10.1179/crn.2012.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cranio        ISSN: 0886-9634            Impact factor:   2.020


  22 in total

1.  Estrogen via estrogen receptor beta partially inhibits mandibular condylar cartilage growth.

Authors:  J Chen; Y Kamiya; I Polur; M Xu; T Choi; Z Kalajzic; H Drissi; S Wadhwa
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 2.  Prevalence of temporomandibular dysfunction in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Marina Fernandes de Sena; Késsia Suênia F de Mesquita; Fernanda Regina R Santos; Francisco Wanderley G P Silva; Kranya Victoria D Serrano
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2013-12

3.  Clinical variables associated with the presence of articular pain in patients with temporomandibular joint clicking.

Authors:  Rodrigo Lorenzi Poluha; Giancarlo De la Torre Canales; Leonardo Rigoldi Bonjardim; Paulo César Rodrigues Conti
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Imaging Approach to Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.

Authors:  H Morales; R Cornelius
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 5.  Stem Cells for Temporomandibular Joint Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Shipin Zhang; Adrian U J Yap; Wei Seong Toh
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 6.  Estrogen signaling impacts temporomandibular joint and periodontal disease pathology.

Authors:  Jennifer L Robinson; Pamela M Johnson; Karolina Kister; Michael T Yin; Jing Chen; Sunil Wadhwa
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 7.  Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in Older Adults.

Authors:  Sumit Yadav; Yun Yang; Eliane H Dutra; Jennifer L Robinson; Sunil Wadhwa
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Radiographic changes in the temporomandibular joint related to medication in rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Gamze Şirin; Mehmet Amuk
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Assessment of the TMJ Dysfunction Using the Computerized Facebow Analysis of Selected Parameters.

Authors:  Edward Kijak; Danuta Lietz-Kijak; Bogumiła Frączak; Zbigniew Śliwiński; Jerzy Margielewicz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Orofacial pain management: current perspectives.

Authors:  Marcela Romero-Reyes; James M Uyanik
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.