Literature DB >> 22606803

Effect of insecticides and Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) genotype on a predator and parasitoid and implications for the evolution of insecticide resistance.

Xiaoxia Liu1, Mao Chen, Hilda L Collins, David Onstad, Rick Roush, Qingwen Zhang, Anthony M Shelton.   

Abstract

In the laboratory and in cages in the greenhouse, we evaluated the toxicity of two insecticides (lambda-cyhalothrin and spinosad) on the parasitoid, Diadegma insulare (Cresson), and the predator, Coleomegilla maculate (DeGeer), both natural enemies of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Lambda-cyhalothrin was very toxic to both natural enemies. Spinosad was less toxic to C. maculata adults and larvae, and slightly toxic to D. insulare. Both natural enemies suppressed P. xylostella populations in cages with 80% spinosad-treated and 20% nontreated plants; such suppression was not seen when lambda-cyhalothrin was used. Using broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. variety italica, a common host for P. xylostella, we also studied direct and indirect effects of both natural enemies in the presence and absence of the two insecticides and to different P. xylostella genotypes: resistant to the insecticide, susceptible, or heterozygous. Neither natural enemy could distinguish host genotype if P. xylostella were feeding on nontreated plants. They could also not distinguish between larvae feeding on spinosad-treated plants and nontreated plants, but D. insulare could distinguish between larvae feeding on lambda-cyhalothrin treated and nontreated plants. Our studies suggest that lambda-cyhalothrin has direct toxicity to these two natural enemies, can affect their host foraging and acceptance of P. xylostella and consequently would not be compatible in conserving these natural enemies in a program for suppression of P. xylostella. In contrast, our studies suggest that treatment with spinosad has much less effect on these natural enemies and would allow them to help suppress populations of P. xylostella. These findings are discussed in relation to the evolution of insecticide resistance and suppression of the pest populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22606803     DOI: 10.1603/ec11299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Imidacloprid affects the functional response of predator Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) to strains of Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Bt cotton.

Authors:  J B Malaquias; F S Ramalho; C Omoto; W A C Godoy; R F Silveira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Lethal and sublethal effects of lufenuron on sugarcane borer Diatraea flavipennella and its parasitoid Cotesia flavipes.

Authors:  Ana Paula Pereira Fonseca; Edmilson Jacinto Marques; Jorge Braz Torres; Liliane Marques Silva; Herbert Álvaro Abreu Siqueira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Toxicity and Residual Activity of Insecticides against Diadegma insulare, a Parasitoid of the Diamondback Moth.

Authors:  Daniel Ramírez-Cerón; Esteban Rodríguez-Leyva; J Refugio Lomeli-Flores; Lauro Soto-Rojas; Samuel Ramírez-Alarcón; Antonio Segura-Miranda
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Testing insecticidal activity of novel chemically synthesized siRNA against Plutella xylostella under laboratory and field conditions.

Authors:  Liang Gong; Yong Chen; Zhen Hu; Meiying Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Natural enemies delay insect resistance to Bt crops.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Liu; Mao Chen; Hilda L Collins; David W Onstad; Richard T Roush; Qingwen Zhang; Elizabeth D Earle; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.